ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Rouviere's sulcus - An anatomical landmark for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic Mirage: Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis and the Illusion of Gallbladder Carcinoma.Cureus · 2026Article
- Surgical Repair of Bile Duct Injuries Due to Cholecystectomy-An Experience from a Referral Center in Slovenia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rouviere's Sulcus Analysis: A Critical Safety Analysis and a Guide to Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been established as the gold standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones, however surgeons face the risk of injuring bile ducts and vessels due to the inherent limitations of laparoscopy. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study done in the Department of Surgery, Shree Birendra Hospital (SBH) on patients who were posted for LC. The study period was through April 2021 to September 2021. During LC, the anatomy of RS was noted and classified into Group A (RS present) or Group B (RS absent). Data analyses were performed considering a p-value of <0.05 as statistically significant. Results: RS was present in 169 (93.9%) out of 180 cases. The open sulcus type was found in 114 cases (67.5%), followed by closed type in 26 (15.4%), slit sulcus type in 22 (13.0%), and scar type in 7 (4.1%) cases. Injury to cystic artery occurred in one case (0.15%) of Group A while in two cases (18.18%) of Group B (p-value = 0.001). The adjusted operative time in Group A and Group B were 50.61 ± 10.33 min and 69.86 ± 15.28 min respectively (p-value = 0.005). There was significant difference between Group A and Group B in conversion to open surgery - 01 (0.59%) and 04 (36%) respectively (p-value < 0.001). Surgical Site Infection (SSI) was detected in nine (5.33%) cases among Group A and in three (27.2%) cases among Group B (p-value = 0.028). Conclusion: RS can be considered as an important anatomical landmark for safer LC with fewer injuries to cystic artery, SSI, conversion to open surgery and shorter operative time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.