ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
A scoping review of the role of ascorbic acid in modifying fluid requirements in the resuscitation phase in burn patients.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-dose intravenous versus low-dose oral vitamin C in burn care: potential protective effects in the severely burned: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate fluid resuscitation in burn patients is the main therapy in improving clinical outcomes. The standard target is to provide adequate end-organ perfusion, taking into consideration the possible risks of fluid creep and over-resuscitation. Anti-oxidant therapies, especially vitamin C, have been evaluated as an adjuvant therapy in resuscitating burn patients in the acute phase. Methods: A scoping search in PubMed and Google Scholar was done using the search terms "ascorbic acid" "burn patients", "vitamin C″, "burn", and "fluid requirements". They were either searched individually or in combination. All relevant articles, of any study design (published till mid-October 2021), were included and narratively discussed in this paper. Results: Ten articles were reviewed in this paper. Through these articles, we provided in detail the beneficial effects of vitamin C on burn patients in reducing fluid requirements in the resuscitation phase. Additionally, we summarized the pathophysiology of vitamin C in this entity, shedding light on the potential adverse effects and the importance of conducting similar clinical trials. Conclusion: We cannot deny the beneficial effects of vitamin C on burn patients. Therefore, each burn center should conduct clinical trials until reaching, at the end, an evidence-based guideline providing a clear protocol in terms of its administration and dosage, aiming to minimize possible adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.