ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Application of Intelligent Detection of Neural Signal in Depth Evaluation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Anesthesia.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of nerve block combined with superficial general anaesthesia on anaesthetic dosage and anaesthetic awakening in paediatric surgery.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to evaluate the application of EEG intelligent detection in gynecological anesthesia depth, the application of ANGEL-6000 EEG depth monitor in laparoscopic gynecological anesthesia was proposed. This method was applied to 60 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery in our hospital from February to August 2016. Inclusion criteria were ASA i ∼ ii; the average age was (37.8 ± 6.6) years from 20 to 50 years old; the average body weight was (51.53 ± 3.87) kg; conscious and no communication barriers; and patients without instrument ventilation. The patients were divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. The two groups were anesthetized with the same anesthetic drugs, and their consciousness index was monitored. IoC values were recorded before induction of anesthesia (T0), 5 min after intubation (T1), 5 min after operation (T2), intraoperative exploration (T3), at the end of operation (T4), 1 min before extubation (T5), and 5 min after extubation (T6). The dosage of anesthetic drugs, operation time, extubation time, and operation time of the two groups were statistically analyzed. Compared with the operation time of patients in the two groups, the extubation time, awake time, and time out of the operating room of patients in the control group were longer than the observation group. The IoC values of patients in the control group at T0 and T6 time points were lower than those in the observation group at each time point from T1 to T5. Comparison of perioperative dose of remifentanil and atracurium between the two groups was performed. The control group used more propofol dose in perioperative period. The application of neuroelectric signal in laparoscopic gynecological surgery to detect changes in perioperative IoC value can well reflect the level of consciousness of patients and reflect the effect of perioperative stimulation at different time points on the EEG of patients in real time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.