Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Trajectory of IgG to SARS-CoV-2 After Vaccination With BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 in an Employee Cohort and Comparison With Natural Infection.

Behnam Keshavarz, Nathan E Richards, Lisa J Workman, Jaimin Patel, Lyndsey M Muehling, Glenda Canderan, Deborah D Murphy, Savannah G Brovero, Samuel M Ailsworth, Will H Eschenbacher and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Behnam KeshavarzDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Nathan E RichardsDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Lisa J WorkmanDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Jaimin PatelDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Lyndsey M MuehlingDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Glenda CanderanDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Deborah D MurphyDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Savannah G BroveroDivision of Infectious Disease and International Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Samuel M AilsworthDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Will H EschenbacherDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Emily C McGowanDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Barbara J MannDivision of Infectious Disease and International Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Michael R NelsonDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Alexandra KadlDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Judith A WoodfolkDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Thomas A E Platts-MillsDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Jeffrey M WilsonDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

IgE antibodies to the mammalian oligosaccharide galactose-alpha-1, 3-galactose (alpha-gal): immunology, epidemiology and relevance to allergic and inflammatory diseaseR37AI020565 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI THOMAS A. PLATTS-MILLS · 1992 to 2026
$8.4M
Protective and Pathogenic T Cells Responding to SARS-CoV-2 in Health and DiseaseR21AI160334 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI WOODFOLK, JUDITH A · 2021 to 2022
$444k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI160334NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI020565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three COVID-19 vaccines have received FDA-authorization and are in use in the United States, but there is limited head-to-head data on the durability of the immune response elicited by these vaccines. Using a quantitative assay we studied binding IgG antibodies elicited by BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 or Ad26.COV2.S in an employee cohort over a span out to 10 months. Age and sex were explored as response modifiers. Of 234 subjects in the vaccine cohort, 114 received BNT162b2, 114 received mRNA-1273 and six received Ad26.COV2.S. IgG levels measured between seven to 20 days after the second vaccination were similar in recipients of BNT162b2 and mRNA-127 and were ~50-fold higher than in recipients of Ad26.COV2.S. However, by day 21 and at later time points IgG levels elicited by BNT162b2 were lower than mRNA-1273. Accordingly, the IgG decay curve was steeper for BNT162b2 than mRNA-1273. Age was a significant modifier of IgG levels in recipients of BNT162b2, but not mRNA-1273. After six months, IgG levels elicited by BNT162b2, but not mRNA-1273, were lower than IgG levels in patients who had been hospitalized with COVID-19 six months earlier. Similar findings were observed when comparing vaccine-elicited antibodies with steady-state IgG targeting seasonal human coronaviruses. Differential IgG decay could contribute to differences observed in clinical protection over time between BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCOVID-192019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Ad26COVS1Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin GSARS-CoV-2United StatesVaccination2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Ad26COVS1Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GCOVID-19durabilityhuman coronaviruses (HCoV)IgGmRNA vaccinesOC43SARS-CoV-2vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35386716
PMCPMC8978955
OpenAlexW4220797730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.