Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386642›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in allergy2022

The Road Toward Transformative Treatments for Food Allergy.

Allyssa Phelps, Kelly Bruton, Emily Grydziuszko, Joshua F E Koenig, Manel Jordana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Food oral immunotherapy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Monitoring Memory B Cells by Next-Generation ImmunoSpotMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allyssa PhelpsDepartment of Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre (MIRC), Schroeder Allergy and Immunology Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Kelly BrutonDepartment of Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre (MIRC), Schroeder Allergy and Immunology Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Emily GrydziuszkoDepartment of Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre (MIRC), Schroeder Allergy and Immunology Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Joshua F E KoenigDepartment of Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre (MIRC), Schroeder Allergy and Immunology Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Manel JordanaDepartment of Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre (MIRC), Schroeder Allergy and Immunology Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A series of landmark studies have provided conclusive evidence that the early administration of food allergens dramatically prevents the emergence of food allergy. One of the greatest remaining challenges is whether patients with established food allergy can return to health. This challenge is particularly pressing in the case of allergies against peanut, tree nuts, fish, and shellfish which are lifelong in most patients and may elicit severe reactions. The standard of care for food allergy is allergen avoidance and the timely administration of epinephrine upon accidental exposure. Epinephrine, and other therapeutic options like antihistamines provide acute symptom relief but do not target the underlying pathology of the disease. In principle, any transformative treatment for established food allergy would require the restoration of a homeostatic immunological state. This may be attained through either an active, non-harmful immune response (immunological tolerance) or a lack of a harmful immune response (e.g., anergy), such that subsequent exposures to the allergen do not elicit a clinical reaction. Importantly, such a state must persist beyond the course of the treatment and exert its protective effects permanently. In this review, we will discuss the immunological mechanisms that maintain lifelong food allergies and are, consequently, those which must be dismantled or reprogrammed to instate a clinically non-reactive state. Arguably, the restoration of such a state in the context of an established food allergy would require a reprogramming of the immune response against a given food allergen. We will discuss existing and experimental therapeutic strategies to eliminate IgE reactivity and, lastly, will propose outstanding questions to pave the road to the development of novel, transformative therapeutics in food allergy.

Indexed as

allergy (hypersensitive anaphylaxis)food allergy (FA)immunologyimmunotherapypeanut (Arachis hypogaea)treatment

Identifiers

PMID35386642
PMCPMC8974751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.