ReviewNeuro-oncology advances
Diagnostic performance of DSC perfusion MRI to distinguish tumor progression and treatment-related changes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Late enhancement and washout maps for distinguishing tumor progression from radiation necrosis in malignant brain tumors: an exploratory study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Dynamic Tumor Volume Changes after Debulking Surgery of Optic Hypothalamus Pilocytic Astrocytoma.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- Salvage therapies for recurrent grade 4 IDH-wildtype glioma: a BRAIN Registry analysis of real-world treatment patterns.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical Utility of [AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Metabolic Imaging and Molecular Signatures Reveal Metabolic Phenotypes in Recurrent Glioblastoma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Reconstruction matters: influence of EARL standards and BSREM in [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Multiparametric Dynamic Contrast Imaging for Voxelwise Quantitative Assessment of Brain Tumors.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- The Value of Cerebral Blood Volume Derived from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI in Predicting IDH Mutation Status of Brain Gliomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multiparametric MRI for characterization of the tumour microenvironment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- An accessible deep learning tool for voxel-wise classification of brain malignancies from perfusion MRI.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Article
- Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma: what neurosurgeons need to know.Journal of neurosurgery · 2023Review
- HybridJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Comparative study between dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging and arterial spin labelling perfusion in differentiating low-grade from high-grade brain tumours.Polish journal of radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In patients with high-grade glioma (HGG), true disease progression and treatment-related changes often appear similar on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), making it challenging to evaluate therapeutic response. Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI has been extensively studied to differentiate between disease progression and treatment-related changes. This systematic review evaluated and synthesized the evidence for using DSC MRI to distinguish true progression from treatment-related changes. Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE and the Ovid MEDLINE in-process file (January 2005-October 2019) and the reference lists. Studies on test performance of DSC MRI using relative cerebral blood volume in HGG patients were included. One investigator abstracted data, and a second investigator confirmed them; two investigators independently assessed study quality. Meta-analyses were conducted to quantitatively synthesize area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: We screened 1177 citations and included 28 studies with 638 patients with true tumor progression, and 430 patients with treatment-related changes. Nineteen studies reported AUROC and the combined AUROC is 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.90). All studies contributed data for sensitivity and specificity, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity are 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.88), and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.83). Extensive subgroup analyses based on study, treatment, and imaging characteristics generally showed similar results. Conclusions: There is moderate strength of evidence that relative cerebral blood volume obtained from DSC imaging demonstrated "excellent" ability to discriminate true tumor progression from treatment-related changes, with robust sensitivity and specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.