Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386524›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

A New Real-Life Test for Reciprocity in Autistic Adults: The Interactive Drawing Test.

Tineke Backer van Ommeren, Marianne Vreugdenhil, Hans M Koot, Annelies Spek, Anke M Scheeren, Robert M Jertberg, Sander Begeer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Altered Patterns of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Underpin Reduced Expressions of Social-Emotional Reciprocity in Autistic Adults.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tineke Backer van OmmerenDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marianne VreugdenhilDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Hans M KootDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Annelies SpekAutism Expertise Center, Eemnes, Netherlands.
Anke M ScheerenDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Robert M JertbergDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sander BegeerDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLReach-Aut Academic Centre for Autism · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired social-emotional reciprocity is a defining feature of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Deficits in reciprocity can be difficult to assess, particularly in adults with average or above average intelligence. The recently developed Interactive Drawing Test (IDT) measures reciprocity in children and adolescents with and without ASD based on spontaneous non-verbal interactions during the joint creation of a drawing. In this study, we examined if the IDT is able to differentiate between 19 normally intelligent adults with ASD and 18 without ASD. The IDT total reciprocity score, including the number of meaningful contributions to objects initially drawn by the examiner, was lower in the autistic adults compared to those without ASD. By assessing both the quantity and quality of spontaneous reciprocal behavior, the IDT was able to identify subtle differences in reciprocal behavior of adults with and without ASD with average intelligence. Even though a larger sample is required to determine its psychometric properties, the IDT appears a promising tool to enrich the diagnostic process of ASD in adults. Impaired social-emotional reciprocity is a defining feature of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The clinical field lacks sensitive tests for assessing impaired reciprocity. The recently developed Interactive Drawing Test (IDT) for reciprocity was tested in autistic and non-autistic adults. During the IDT, an examiner and participant make a joint drawing, taking turns, without specifying what they will draw. We aimed to investigated whether autistic adults showed less reciprocal behavior on the IDT compared to non-autistic participants. Autistic participants were less likely to jointly draw with the examiner, in particular when the examiner initiated a topic. The IDT revealed subtle but characteristic differences in reciprocal behavior related to ASD, suggesting it may be a promising diagnostic tool.

Indexed as

autistic adultsengagementonline social cognitionreal-life diagnostic assessmentreciprocitysocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID35386524
PMCPMC8977513
OpenAlexW4225677277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.