ArticleCureus2022
Temporal Bone Cholesteatoma: Typical Findings and Evaluation of Diagnostic Utility on High Resolution Computed Tomography.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal imaging in conductive hearing loss: Optimising CT, MRI and CTA for accurate diagnosis and management.SA journal of radiology · 2026Review
- The Role of Stepwise Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Cholesteatoma in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2025Article
- A 3D and Explainable Artificial Intelligence Model for Evaluation of Chronic Otitis Media Based on Temporal Bone Computed Tomography: Model Development, Validation, and Clinical Application.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: How Much Do We Need It?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pre-operative assessment of middle ear cholesteatoma is a must for assessing the disease's location, extent, and complication, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the modality of choice. Therefore, this study aims to assess the common signs of cholesteatoma on HRCT and its diagnostic ability. Methods Fifty patients with suspected cholesteatoma were considered for the study, which was carried out on an Ingenuity Core 128 slice CT scanner (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands). The bilateral temporal bones of 50 patients were assessed for soft tissue density and associated findings. The number of temporal bones with soft tissue density was then correlated with intra-operative and histopathological examinations (HPE). Results Out of 100 temporal bones, 63 were diseased, and 37 were normal temporal bones. Epitympanum/Prussak's space was the most involved site with soft tissue density seen in 60/63 (95.2%) diseased temporal bones, followed by aditus ad antrum and mesotympanum, which was seen in 51/63 (80.9%) diseased temporal bones. The majority of the soft tissue lesions were non-dependent, accounting for 43/63 (68.2%) of the diseased temporal bones. Bony erosions were seen in 54/63 (85.7%) and bony expansion in 35/63 (55.5%) of the diseased temporal bones. HRCT showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 88.1%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 92.1%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%, and accuracy of 95% for detection of cholesteatoma. Conclusion HRCT of the temporal bone precisely demonstrates cholesteatoma's location, extent, and bony changes. Therefore, it has exceptional sensitivity, high specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing cholesteatoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.