Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386429›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Comparison of changes in fecal microbiota of calves with and without dam.

Mengya Li, Zhisheng Wang, Lizhi Wang, Bai Xue, Rui Hu, Huawei Zou, Siqiang Liu, Ali Mujtaba Shah, Quanhui Peng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mengya LiKey Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safety Production, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Zhisheng WangKey Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safety Production, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Lizhi WangKey Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safety Production, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Bai XueKey Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safety Production, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Rui HuKey Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safety Production, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Huawei ZouKey Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safety Production, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Siqiang LiuKey Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safety Production, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Ali Mujtaba ShahKey Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safety Production, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3698-6775
Quanhui PengKey Laboratory of Bovine Low-Carbon Farming and Safety Production, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pastoral areas and semi-agricultural and semi-pastoral areas of Sichuan, beef cattle breeding mode is mainly dependent on nature to raise livestock. On the one hand, owing to the shortage of forage grass in spring, cows suffer from malnutrition. On the other hand, competition for milk between human and livestock further deepens the malnutrition of newborn calves, and the mortality rate even exceeds 40%, resulting in serious waste of beef cattle source resources. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different cultivation methods (calves with and without dam) and age on calves hindgut microbiome. Sixteen healthy calves (Yak ♂ × Pian cattle ♀, with similar birthday 0 ± 2 d and body weight 13.1 ± 1.13 kg), were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The control group was cultivated with heifers, whereas the treatment group was cultivated without heifers and was fed milk replacer during the whole 95 days formal experimental period. Fecal samples were collected on 35, 65 and 95 days of age for high-throughput sequencing. The α-diversity was different between the two groups on day 35; however, the bacterial species richness and diversity was almost not different on day 95. Principal coordinates analysis revealed significant difference between the two groups on all the three time points, and the timepoints of day 65 and 95 were closer and separated from the timepoints of day 35 in calves with dam, whereas the timepoints of day 35 and 65 were closer and separated from day 95 in calves without dam. As time passed, the abundance of Firmicutes increased, while Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria decreased in calves with dam. But in calves without dam, the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria increased on day 65 and then decreased on day 95. In genus level, the relative abundance of

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMalnutritionMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaCattleFecesFemaleHumansMilkProteobacteriaCalfCultivation methodDynamicsMicrobial community

Identifiers

PMID35386429
PMCPMC8978885
OpenAlexW4220705966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.