Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386419›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Prediction of Vagal Nerve Stimulation Efficacy in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (PRECISE): Prospective Study for Pre-implantation Prediction/Study Design.

Irena Dolezalova, Eva Koritakova, Lenka Souckova, Jan Chrastina, Jan Chladek, Radka Stepanova, Milan Brazdil

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04935567 (PRediction of Vagal Nerve Stimulation EfficaCy In Drug-reSistant Epilepsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04935567 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

PRediction of Vagal Nerve Stimulation EfficaCy In Drug-reSistant Epilepsy: Prospective Study for Pre-implantation Prediction

TypeinterventionalSponsorMasaryk UniversityRan2021 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsDrug Resistant EpilepsyArmsStatistical model for the prediction of VNS efficacy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Few-shot segmentation and fiber tractography of human vagus nerve using 3D-MUSE imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Human microscopic vagus nerve anatomy using deep learning on 3D-MUSE images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Irena DolezalovaThe First Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czechia.
Eva KoritakovaFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Lenka SouckovaInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czechia.
Jan ChrastinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czechia.
Jan ChladekBehavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Radka StepanovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Milan BrazdilThe First Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czechia.
Masaryk University · CZSt. Anne's University Hospital Brno · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZCentral European Institute of Technology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) can be indicated in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, who are not eligible for resective epilepsy surgery. In VNS therapy, the responder rate (i.e., percentage of subjects experiencing ≥50% seizure reduction) is ~50%. At the moment, there is no widely-accepted possibility to predict VNS efficacy in a particular patient based on pre-implantation data, which can lead to unnecessary surgery and improper allocation of financial resources. The principal aim of PRediction of vagal nerve stimulation EfficaCy In drug-reSistant Epilepsy (PRECISE) study is to verify the predictability of VNS efficacy by analysis of pre-implantation routine electroencephalogram (EEG). Methods: PRECISE is designed as a prospective multicentric study in which patients indicated to VNS therapy will be recruited. Patients will be classified as predicted responders vs. predicted non-responders using pre-implantation EEG analyses. After the first and second year of the study, the real-life outcome (responder vs. non-responder) will be determined. The real-life outcome and predicted outcome will be compared in terms of accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. In the meantime, the patients will be managed according to the best clinical practice to obtain the best therapeutic response. The primary endpoint will be the accuracy of the statistical model for prediction of response to VNS therapy in terms of responders and non-responders. The secondary endpoint will be the quantification of differences in EEG power spectra (Relative Mean Power, %) between real-life responders and real-life non-responders to VNS therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy and the sensitivity and specificity of the model. Discussion: PRECISE relies on the results of our previous work, through which we developed a statistical classifier for VNS response (responders vs. non-responders) based on differences in EEG power spectra dynamics (Pre-X-Stim). Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04935567.

Indexed as

drug-resistant epilepsyefficacy predictionstatistical modelstudy designvagal nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35386419
PMCPMC8979018
OpenAlexW4221003229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.