Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386412›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Automated Pupillometry for Prediction of Electroencephalographic Reactivity in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Lorenzo Peluso, Lorenzo Ferlini, Marta Talamonti, Narcisse Ndieugnou Djangang, Elisa Gouvea Bogossian, Marco Menozzi, Filippo Annoni, Elisabetta Macchini, Benjamin Legros, Paolo Severgnini and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prognostic role of quantitative pupillometry in traumatic brain injury: a scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Application of Pupillometry in Neurocritical Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Lorenzo PelusoDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Lorenzo FerliniDepartment of Neurology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Marta TalamontiDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Narcisse Ndieugnou DjangangDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Elisa Gouvea BogossianDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Marco MenozziDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Filippo AnnoniDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Elisabetta MacchiniDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Benjamin LegrosDepartment of Neurology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Paolo SevergniniDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Insubria University, Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care - ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Jacques CreteurDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Mauro OddoCritical Care Clinical Research Unit, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CHUV-Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas GaspardDepartment of Neurology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Erasmus Hospital · BEUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Insubria · ITYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electroencephalography (EEG) is widely used to monitor critically ill patients. However, EEG interpretation requires the presence of an experienced neurophysiologist and is time-consuming. Aim of this study was to evaluate whether parameters derived from an automated pupillometer (AP) might help to assess the degree of cerebral dysfunction in critically ill patients. Methods: Prospective study conducted in the Department of Intensive Care of Erasme University Hospital in Brussels, Belgium. Pupillary assessments were performed using the AP in three subgroups of patients, concomitantly monitored with continuous EEG: "anoxic brain injury", "Non-anoxic brain injury" and "other diseases". An independent neurologist blinded to patient's history and AP results scored the degree of encephalopathy and reactivity on EEG using a standardized scale. The mean value of Neurologic Pupil Index (NPi), pupillary size, constriction rate, constriction and dilation velocity (CV and DV) and latency for both eyes, obtained using the NPi®-200 (Neuroptics, Laguna Hills, CA, USA), were reported. Results: We included 214 patients (mean age 60 years, 55% male). EEG tracings were categorized as: mild ( Conclusions: This study suggests that low DV measured by the AP might effectively identify an unreactive EEG background, in particular in critically ill patients without anoxic brain injury.

Indexed as

autonomic dysfunctionbrain injuryEEGencephalopathyintensive care unitpupillary function

Identifiers

PMID35386412
PMCPMC8977520
OpenAlexW4221083085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.