Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386397›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2022

Genomic divergence and a lack of recent introgression between commercial and wild bumblebees (

Cecilia Kardum Hjort, Josephine R Paris, Peter Olsson, Lina Herbertsson, Joachim R de Miranda, Rachael Y Dudaniec, Henrik G Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Museum genomics suggests long-term population decline in a putatively extinct bumble bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cecilia Kardum HjortDepartment of Biology Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9901-9478
Josephine R ParisBiosciences College of Life and Environmental Science University of Exeter Exeter UK.
Peter OlssonDepartment of Biology Lund University Lund Sweden.
Lina HerbertssonCentre for Environmental and Climate Science Lund University Lund Sweden.
Joachim R de MirandaDepartment of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden.
Rachael Y DudaniecSchool of Natural Sciences Macquarie University Sydney Australia.
Henrik G SmithDepartment of Biology Lund University Lund Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global movement of bees for agricultural pollination services can affect local pollinator populations via hybridization. When commercial bumblebees are of the same species but of different geographic origin, intraspecific hybridization may result in beneficial integration of new genetic variation, or alternatively may disrupt locally adapted gene complexes. However, neither the existence nor the extent of genomic introgression and evolutionary divergence between wild and commercial bumblebees is fully understood. We obtained whole-genome sequencing data from wild and commercial

Indexed as

Bombus terrestrisbumblebeesintrogressionpollinationselectionsingle nucleotide polymorphismsstructural variantswhole‐genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35386397
PMCPMC8965379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.