Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386375›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology

A novel system based on artificial intelligence for predicting blastocyst viability and visualizing the explanation.

Noritoshi Enatsu, Isao Miyatsuka, Le My An, Miki Inubushi, Kunihiro Enatsu, Junko Otsuki, Toshiroh Iwasaki, Shoji Kokeguchi, Masahide Shiotani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Bovine embryo productionAnimal reproduction · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noritoshi EnatsuHanabusa Women's Clinic Kobe Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9375-5191
Isao MiyatsukaNextGeM inc. Tokyo Japan.
Le My AnNextGeM inc. Tokyo Japan.
Miki InubushiHanabusa Women's Clinic Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Kunihiro EnatsuHanabusa Women's Clinic Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Junko OtsukiHanabusa Women's Clinic Kobe Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8183-8651
Toshiroh IwasakiHanabusa Women's Clinic Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Shoji KokeguchiHanabusa Women's Clinic Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Masahide ShiotaniHanabusa Women's Clinic Kobe Hyogo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to invent and evaluate the novel artificial intelligence (AI) system named Fertility image Testing Through Embryo (FiTTE) for predicting blastocyst viability and visualizing the explanations via gradient-based localization. Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed 19 342 static blastocyst images with related inspection histories from 9961 infertile patients who underwent in vitro fertilization. Among these data, 17 984 cycles of single-blastocyst transfer were used for training, and data from 1358 cycles were used for testing purposes. Results: The prediction accuracy for clinical pregnancy achieved by a control model using conventional Gardner scoring system was 59.8%, and area under the curve (AUC) was 0.62. FiTTE improved the prediction accuracy by using blastocyst images to 62.7% and AUC of 0.68. Additionally, the accuracy achieved by an ensemble model using image plus clinical data was 65.2% and AUC was 0.71, representing an improvement in prediction accuracy. The visualization algorithm showed brighter colors with blastocysts that resulted in clinical pregnancy. Conclusions: The authors invented the novel AI system, FiTTE, which could provide more precise prediction of the probability of clinical pregnancy using blastocyst images secondary to single embryo transfer than the conventional Gardner scoring assessments. FiTTE could also provide explanation of AI prediction using colored blastocyst images.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceassisted reproductive technologygradient‐weighted class activation mappingin vitro fertilization

Identifiers

PMID35386375
PMCPMC8967284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.