Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386371›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology

The possible effects of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 on the practice of fertility preservation in female cancer patients in Japan.

Chisato Kunitomi, Miyuki Harada, Yuko Sanada, Akari Kusamoto, Yasushi Takai, Tatsuro Furui, Yuko Kitagawa, Mitsutoshi Yamada, Chie Watanabe, Koichiro Tsugawa and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Chisato KunitomiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Miyuki HaradaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-5600
Yuko SanadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Akari KusamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Yasushi TakaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Saitama Medical Center Saitama Medical University Kawagoe Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-8481
Tatsuro FuruiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine Gifu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-219X
Yuko KitagawaDepartment of Surgery Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Mitsutoshi YamadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-316X
Chie WatanabeDepartment of Nursing School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Koichiro TsugawaDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery Department of Surgery St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology Faculty of Medicine University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan.
Hajime HosoiDepartment of Nursing Doshisha Women's College of Liberal Arts Kyotanabe City Japan.
Mitsuru MiyachiDepartment of Pediatrics Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Kazuhiko SugiyamaDepartment of Clinical Oncology & Neuro-oncology Program Hiroshima University Hospital Hiroshima Japan.
Yoshinobu MaedaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan.
Akira KawaiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Toshio HamataniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Keishi FujioDepartment of Allergy and Rheumatology Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Nao SuzukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-8127
Yutaka OsugaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In 2017, the first guidelines for fertility preservation in cancer patients were published in Japan. However, the impact of the guidelines remains unknown. Therefore, the authors conducted a nationwide survey on cryopreservation procedures in the period from shortly before to after publication of the guidelines (2016-2019) and compared the results with our previous survey (2011-2015). The authors also surveyed reproductive specialists' awareness of the guidelines and implementation problems. Methods: The authors sent a questionnaire to 618 assisted reproductive technology facilities certified by the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Results: The authors received responses from 395 institutions (63.8%). Among them, 144 institutions conducted cryopreservation for cancer patients (vs. 126 in 2011-2015) and performed 2537 embryo or oocyte and 178 ovarian tissue cryopreservation procedures (vs. 1085 and 122, respectively). Compared with the previous period, indications were more varied and protocols for controlled ovarian stimulation were more standardized. Reproductive specialists' interest in oncofertility was high, but many reported three main difficulties: selecting a treatment method, storing samples in the long term, and securing the necessary human resources. Conclusions: The practice of fertility preservation in cancer patients in Japan has been considerably affected by the first Japanese guidelines.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologybreast cancerchildhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA)fertility preservationoncofertility

Identifiers

PMID35386371
PMCPMC8967277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.