ArticleReproductive medicine and biology
Clinical relevance of a newly developed endometrial receptivity test for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Japan.
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Personalized versus standard frozen-thawed embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Pooled it
- The efficacy of RNA-seq-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) in guiding personalized embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome without recurrent implantation failure: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Trial
- Investigating cycle-to-cycle variation and the impact of endometrial injury through differential gene expression analysis.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Advanced maternal age as a risk factor for endometrial receptivity in repeated implantation failure: intersectional transcriptomic analysis and gene validation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- The study on the clinical efficacy of endometrial receptivity analysis and influence factors of displaced window of implantation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Personalized embryo transfer guided by rsERT improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The use of propensity score matching to assess the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Precise hourly personalized embryo transfer significantly improves clinical outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Development of a Predictive Model for Optimization of Embryo Transfer Timing Using Blood-Based microRNA Expression Profile.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Factors affecting the ongoing pregnancy rate in women with repeated implantation failure undergoing an endometrial receptivity array.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2023Article
- Chronic endometritis incidence in infertile women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome: a propensity score matched study.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Deciphering the endometrial immune landscape of RIF during the window of implantation from cellular senescence by integrated bioinformatics analysis and machine learning.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Personalized Embryo Transfer Improves Live Birth Rates in Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Propensity Score-Matched Prospective Cohort Study With Window of Implantation Stability Analysis.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
- Clinical relevance of a newly developed endometrial receptivity test for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Japan.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the clinical efficacy of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by a new endometrial receptivity test, ERPeak Methods: Recurrent implantation failure patients of all ages at two private Japanese clinics from April 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The intervention group ( Results: The CPR and LBR of the pET group were significantly higher than those of the npET group (37.7% vs. 20.0%, adjusted OR: 2.64; 95%CI, 1.70-4.11, Conclusions: The new ERPeak
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.