Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386361›Full record

ArticleAccounts of materials research2021

Materials Perspectives for Self-Powered Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices toward Clinical Translation.

Jun Li, Xudong Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of materials research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Autonomous Implants.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Novel Electroactive Therapeutic Platforms for Cardiac Arrhythmia Management.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Biomechanical Sensing Systems for Cardiac Activity Monitoring.International journal of biomaterials · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun LiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7498-6736
Xudong WangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9762-6792
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Nanogenerator-Driven Self-Sustainable Power Source for Intracardiac PacemakersR01HL157077 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WANG, XUDONG · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
Membranous Nanogenerators for in vivo Bio-mechanical Energy HarvestingR01EB021336 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WANG, XUDONG · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157077NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Represented by pacemakers, implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are playing a vital life-saving role in modern society. Although the current CIEDs are evolving quickly in terms of performance, safety, and miniaturization, the bulky and rigid battery creates the largest hurdle toward further development of a soft system that can be attached and conform to tissues without causing undesirable physiologic changes. Over 50% of patients with pacemakers require additional surgery procedures to replace a drained battery. Abrupt battery malfunction and failure contributes up to 2.4% of implanted leadless pacemakers. The battery also has risks of lethal interference with diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Applying the implantable nanogenerators (i-NGs) technology to CIEDs is regarded as a promising solution to the battery challenge and enables self-powering capability. I-NGs based on the principle of either triboelectricity (TENG) or piezoelectricity (PENG) can convert biomechanical energy into electricity effectively. Meanwhile, a complete heartbeat cycle provides a biomechanical energy of ~0.7 J or an average power of 0.93 W, which is sufficient for the operation of CIEDs considering the power consumption of 5-10

Identifiers

PMID35386361
PMCPMC8979373
OpenAlexW3194642332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.