Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386352›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2022

MBG/ PGA-PCL composite scaffolds provide highly tunable degradation and osteogenic features.

Jiangfeng Li, Chunyi Wang, Guoxing Gao, Xing Yin, Ximing Pu, Bing Shi, Yang Liu, Zhongbing Huang, Juan Wang, Jingtao Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiangfeng LiCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, PR China.
Chunyi WangState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
Guoxing GaoCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, PR China.
Xing YinState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
Ximing PuCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, PR China.
Bing ShiState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
Yang LiuShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Polymers, Shandong Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jinan, 250101, PR China.
Zhongbing HuangCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, PR China.
Juan WangCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, PR China.
Jingtao LiState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
Guangfu YinCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, PR China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains a challenge to achieve satisfactory balance between biodegradability and osteogenic capacity in biosynthetic bone grafts. In this study, we aimed to address this challenge by incorporating mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG) into poly(caprolactone-co-glycolide) (PGA-PCL) at gradient ratios. MBG/PGA-PCL (PGC/M) scaffolds with MBG incorporation ratio at 0, 10%, 25% and 40% (PGC/M0-40) were synthesized using a modified solvent casting-particulate leaching method, and their physiochemical and biological properties were comprehensively evaluated. PGC/M scaffolds exhibited highly perforated porous structure with a large-pore size of 300-450 μm, with ordered MBGs of around 6.0 nm mesopores size uniformly dispersed. The increase in MBG incorporation ratio significantly improved the scaffold surface hydrophilicity, apatite-formation ability and pH stability, increased the weight loss rate while insignificantly influenced the molecular chains degradation of PGA-PCL component, and facilitated the attachment, spreading, viability and proliferation of rat bone marrow stromal cells (rBMSCs) on scaffolds. Moreover, rBMSCs cultured on PGC/M10-40 scaffolds demonstrated enhanced ALP activity and osteogenesis-related gene expression in a MBG dose-dependent manner as compared with those cultured on PGC/M0 scaffolds. When implanted to the rat cranial bone defect, PGC/M25 and PGC/M40 scaffolds induced significantly better bone repair as compared to PGC/M0 and PGC/M10 scaffolds. Besides, the biodegradability of PGC/M scaffolds correlated with the MBG incorporation ratio. These data suggested this novel PGC/M scaffolds as promising bone repair biomaterial with highly tunable hydrophilicity, bioactivity, cytocompatibility, osteogenic activity as well as biodegradability.

Indexed as

Bone repairMesoporous bioactive glassesOsteogenic differentiationPoly(caprolactone-co-glycolide)

Identifiers

PMID35386352
PMCPMC8941175
OpenAlexW4200269131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.