Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386282›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Using Indigenous Standards to Implement the CARE Principles: Setting Expectations through Tribal Research Codes.

Stephanie Russo Carroll, Ibrahim Garba, Rebecca Plevel, Desi Small-Rodriguez, Vanessa Y Hiratsuka, Maui Hudson, Nanibaa' A Garrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Crystallography in Open Science and its open educational resources.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Cultural and contextual relevance of the Indigenous data in the Canadian longitudinal study on aging.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The genetic basis of human height.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Protecting Repositories of Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledges: A Health-Focused Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Open Science Practices in Psychiatric Genetics: A Primer.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie Russo CarrollMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Ibrahim GarbaMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Rebecca PlevelNative Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Desi Small-RodriguezDepartment of Sociology, College of Social Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Vanessa Y HiratsukaCenter for Human Development, College of Health, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, United States.
Maui HudsonTe Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Nanibaa' A GarrisonInstitute for Society and Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical data are now organized in large-scale databases allowing researchers worldwide to access and utilize the data for new projects. As new technologies generate even larger amounts of data, data governance and data management are becoming pressing challenges. The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) were developed to facilitate data sharing. However, the Indigenous Data Sovereignty movement advocates for greater Indigenous control and oversight in order to share data on Indigenous Peoples' terms. This is especially true in the context of genetic research where Indigenous Peoples historically have been unethically exploited in the name of science. This article outlines the relationship between sovereignty and ethics in the context of data to describe the collective rights that Indigenous Peoples assert to increase control over their biomedical data. Then drawing on the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics), we explore how standards already set by Native nations in the United States, such as tribal research codes, provide direction for implementation of the CARE Principles to complement FAIR. A broader approach to policy and procedure regarding tribal participation in biomedical research is required and we make recommendations for tribes, institutions, and ethical practice.

Indexed as

CARE principlesdata governancedata sovereigntygenetic researchIndigenous

Identifiers

PMID35386282
PMCPMC8977641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.