Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386274›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Switching to nonacog beta pegol in hemophilia B: Outcomes from a Canadian real-world, multicenter, retrospective study.

Davide Matino, Alfonso Iorio, Arun Keepanasseril, Federico Germini, Alexandre Caillaud, Manuel Carcao, Julia Hews-Girard, Emma Iserman, Paula James, Adrienne Lee and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Use of nonacog beta pegol during surgery in persons with hemophilia B: a case series.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Davide MatinoMcMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.
Alfonso IorioMcMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3331-8766
Arun KeepanasserilMcMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.
Federico GerminiMcMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0802-3616
Alexandre CaillaudBioPharm Medical Affairs Novo Nordisk Canada Inc. Mississauga ON Canada.
Manuel CarcaoThe Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
Julia Hews-GirardFoothills Medical Centre Alberta Health Services Calgary AB Canada.
Emma IsermanMcMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.
Paula JamesQueen's University Kingston ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4649-9014
Adrienne LeeUniversity of Calgary Calgary AB Canada.
Chai W PhuaWestern University London ON Canada.
Haowei Linda SunUniversity of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-9722
Jerome TeitelSt Michael's Hospital University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6455-8167
Man-Chiu PoonCumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada.
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CANovo Nordisk (Italy) · ITQueen's University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR) captures data from 24 hemophilia treatment centers and patients directly. Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) was approved in Canada in 2018. Objectives: To assess treatment outcomes following switching to N9-GP in a real-world setting. Methods: CBDR data for Canadian male patients (aged 7-72 years) with hemophilia B receiving prophylactic N9-GP for ≥6 months as of March 31, 2021, were included. To allow comparison with the previously used products, only patients for whom data were available in the CBDR for at least 6 months before the switch to N9-GP were included in this retrospective analysis. Results: Forty-two patients were included in the analysis (total observation period: 148.0 patient-years). The distribution of disease severity was 62% severe, 36% moderate, 2% mild, with 62% of patients previously receiving recombinant factor IX-Fc-fusion protein (rFIXFc) and 38% previously receiving standard half-life (SHL) recombinant factor IX (rFIX). During a median follow-up period of 2.3 years on N9-GP prophylaxis, 232 bleeds were reported in 30 patients, 29% of patients reported zero bleeds. The median overall annualized bleeding rate on N9-GP was 0.73 for patients switching from rFIXFc (previously 1.44) and 2.10 for patients switching from SHL rFIX (previously 6.06). Median total annualized factor consumption (IU/kg) was lower with N9-GP than with previous SHL rFIX (2152 vs 3018) and previous rFIXFc (1766 vs 2278). Conclusions: Results from this first real-world study of N9-GP in patients with hemophilia B suggest optimal bleeding control with low factor consumption after switching to N9-GP, irrespective of the previous product.

Indexed as

Canadahemophilia BN9‐GPnonacog beta pegolprophylaxisreal‐world

Identifiers

PMID35386274
PMCPMC8971162
OpenAlexW4220697892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.