ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Neonatal Simulation Program: A 5 Years Educational Journey From Qatar.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing neonatal vascular access: proposing a patient-centered framework based on 7-Rights.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- The applications, complications, and management of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters (n-PICCs): a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Establishing core competencies for neonatology fellowship training in Syria: a modified Delphi study approach.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The Modern Role of Neonatal PICCs Subspecialty.Nursing in critical care · 2025Review
- Short versus long peripheral intravenous catheters in neonates: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Birth injuries in late preterm and term neonates after instrumental delivery: a prospective study on short-term and developmental outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Setting national nursing research priorities in Qatar: A Delphi survey.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Central venous catheter insertion profile and complications among neonates in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Octyl-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue for securement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A retrospective, observational study in the neonatal population.The journal of vascular access · 2024Observational
- Comparing conventional and modified Seldinger techniques using a micro-insertion kit for PICC placement in neonates: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Enhancing residents' neonatal resuscitation competency through team-based simulation training: an intervention educational study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- The ABBA project (Assess Better Before Access): A retrospective cohort study of neonatal intravascular device outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Does the antimicrobial-impregnated peripherally inserted central catheter decrease the CLABSI rate in neonates? Results from a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe the process of implementation, adaptation, expansion and some related clinical intuitional impacts of the neonatal simulation program since its launch in 2016 in a non-simulation neonatal unit. The team has developed 6 types of curricula: 1 full-day course and 5 half-day workshops. A total of 35 free of charge simulation courses/workshops were conducted, 32 in Qatar and 3 abroad with a total of 799 diverse participants. There was a steady increase in the overall success rate of PICC insertion from 81.7% (309/378) to 97.6% (439/450) across 3 years (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.