Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386220›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2022

Various tests of left neglect are associated with distinct territories of hypoperfusion in acute stroke.

Colin Stein, Lisa Bunker, Brian Chu, Richard Leigh, Andreia Faria, Argye E Hillis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin SteinDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lisa BunkerDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9637-3204
Brian ChuDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Richard LeighDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andreia FariaDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1673-002X
Argye E HillisDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5192-1171
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

The Neural Basis of Impaired Affective Prosody in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal DegenerationR01DC015466 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HILLIS, ARGYE E. · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemispatial neglect is among the most disabling consequences of right hemisphere stroke. However, there is no consensus on the optimal assessments to identify neglect. We hypothesized that different tests for neglect given the same day (i) detect distinct aspects and types of neglect, (ii) are sensitive to different cognitive functions (beyond spatially specific processing) and (iii) are associated with distinct regions of hypoperfusion. We examined data from 135 participants with acute, right-hemispheric ischaemic stroke who received an MRI and neglect testing within 48 h of acute infarct in a cross-sectional study. The volume of infarct was calculated on diffusion-weighted imaging. We also scored severity and location of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense vessels in six areas (anterior cerebral artery territory, posterior cerebral artery territory and four within the middle cerebral artery territory) to estimate the volume and location of hypoperfusion in acute stroke. Neglect tests included gap detection, scene copy, line bisection, line cancellation, oral reading and picture description. We found strong correlations between tests that evaluated viewer-centred processing, as well as strong correlations between tests that evaluated stimulus-centred processing. The error rate on different tests was associated with hypoperfusion in different vascular territories, even after controlling for the volume of an infarct. Our results confirm that it is essential to administer a battery of different tests of hemispatial neglect to capture various deficits in attention and spatially specific processing that underlies neglect. Our results also show the potential usefulness of hyperintense vessel ratings as an indication of dysfunction beyond the infarct, as the ratings (and not infarct volume) were highly associated with many clinical deficits. Finally, results underscore that diverse types of neglect are clinically important in acute stroke, as they reflect different areas of hypoperfused tissue, which may be salvageable in the absence of infarct in those areas. As such, neglect batteries may be useful for detecting patients with cortical hypoperfusion who are candidates for reperfusion therapies.

Indexed as

acute ischaemic strokehemispatial neglectMRIvascular territories

Identifiers

PMID35386220
PMCPMC8977645
OpenAlexW4226064070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.