Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386188›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2021

Molecular Docking and Interaction Studies of Identified Abscisic Acid Receptors in

Vidya Niranjan, Amulya Rao, B Janaki, Akshay Uttarkar, Anagha S Setlur, K Chandrashekar, M Udayakumar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances and opportunities for computational interrogation of plant proteins.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vidya NiranjanDepartment of Biotechnology, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru-560059, India.
Amulya RaoDepartment of Biotechnology, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru-560059, India.
B JanakiDepartment of Biotechnology, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru-560059, India.
Akshay UttarkarDepartment of Biotechnology, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru-560059, India.
Anagha S SetlurDepartment of Biotechnology, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru-560059, India.
K ChandrashekarDepartment of Biotechnology, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru-560059, India.
M UdayakumarDepartment of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560065, India.
University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Abiotic stresses affect plants in several ways and as such, phytohormones such as abscisic acid (ABA) play an important role in conferring tolerance towards these stresses. Hence, to comprehend the role of ABA and its interaction with receptors of the plants, a thorough investigation is essential. Aim: The current study aimed to identify the ABA receptors in Methods: Protein sequences of twelve PYL (Pyrabactin resistance 1) and seven PP2C (type 2C protein phosphatase) receptors were retrieved from the Rice Annotation Project database and their 3D structures were predicted using RaptorX. Protein-ligand molecular docking studies between PYL and ABA were performed using AutoDock 1.5.6, followed by 100ns molecular dynamic simulation studies using Desmond to determine the acceptable conformational changes after docking Results: Initial protein-ligand docking studies revealed good binding between the complexes, wherein PYL6-ABA complex showed the best energy of -8.15 kcal/mol. The 100ns simulation studies revealed changes in the RMSD values after docking, indicating acceptable conformational changes. Furthermore, mutagenesis study performed at specific PYL-ABA interacting residues followed by downstream PYL(mut)-ABA-PP2C protein-protein docking results after induction of mutations demonstrated binding energy of -8.17 kcal/mol for PP2C79-PYL11-ABA complex. No naturally occurring SNPs that were responsible for triggering rice PYL mutations were identified when specific amino acid coordinates were mapped at respective genomic coordinates. Conclusion: Thus, the present study provides valuable insights on the interactions of ABA receptors in rice and induced mutations in PYL11 that can enhance the downstream interaction with PP2C.

Indexed as

Abscisic aciddocking studiesmolecular dynamics simulationmutagenesisOryza sativaPP2CPYL

Identifiers

PMID35386188
PMCPMC8922326
OpenAlexW4200285782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.