Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386186›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference)2022

DeIDNER Model: A Neural Network Named Entity Recognition Model for Use in the De-identification of Clinical Notes.

Mahanazuddin Syed, Kevin Sexton, Melody Greer, Shorabuddin Syed, Joseph VanScoy, Farhan Kawsar, Erica Olson, Karan Patel, Jake Erwin, Sudeepa Bhattacharyya and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mahanazuddin SyedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-8978-1565
Kevin SextonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-1460-9867
Melody GreerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
Shorabuddin SyedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-4761-5972
Joseph VanScoyCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
Farhan KawsarCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
Erica OlsonCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
Karan PatelCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
Jake ErwinCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
Sudeepa BhattacharyyaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Arkansas Biosciences Institute, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, U.S.A.
Meredith ZozusDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-1684
Fred PriorDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-6314-5683
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USArkansas Biosciences Institute · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical named entity recognition (NER) is an essential building block for many downstream natural language processing (NLP) applications such as information extraction and de-identification. Recently, deep learning (DL) methods that utilize word embeddings have become popular in clinical NLP tasks. However, there has been little work on evaluating and combining the word embeddings trained from different domains. The goal of this study is to improve the performance of NER in clinical discharge summaries by developing a DL model that combines different embeddings and investigate the combination of standard and contextual embeddings from the general and clinical domains. We developed: 1) A human-annotated high-quality internal corpus with discharge summaries and 2) A NER model with an input embedding layer that combines different embeddings: standard word embeddings, context-based word embeddings, a character-level word embedding using a convolutional neural network (CNN), and an external knowledge sources along with word features as one-hot vectors. Embedding was followed by bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) and conditional random field (CRF) layers. The proposed model reaches or overcomes state-of-the-art performance on two publicly available data sets and an F1 score of 94.31% on an internal corpus. After incorporating mixed-domain clinically pre-trained contextual embeddings, the F1 score further improved to 95.36% on the internal corpus. This study demonstrated an efficient way of combining different embeddings that will improve the recognition performance aiding the downstream de-identification of clinical notes.

Indexed as

Clinical Named Entity RecognitionDeep LearningDe-identificationNatural Language ProcessingWord Embeddings

Identifiers

PMID35386186
PMCPMC8981408
OpenAlexW4214561382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.