Trial reportAging clinical and experimental research2022
Effects of automatic mechanical peripheral stimulation on gait biomechanics in older adults with Parkinson's disease: a randomized crossover clinical trial.
Trial report in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- External sensory cueing on gait in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Amplitude of Lower Limb Muscle Activation in Different Phases of the Illinois Test in Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The correlation of gait and muscle activation characteristics with locomotion dysfunction grade in elderly individuals.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Automated mechanical peripheral stimulation for gait rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease: A comprehensive review.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutomated mechanical peripheral stimulation (AMPS) is a rehabilitation technique suggested to correct gait abnormalities on Parkinson's disease. Although previous studies have suggested increments in functional performance and gait speed after AMPS intervention, little is known about its effect on gait biomechanics.
objectiveTo analyze the effect of an AMPS session on functional performance and gait biomechanics in subjects with Parkinson's disease.
methodsTwenty-eight subjects aged 67±3 years old participated in this study. Kinematics and muscle activation were recorded during walking at a preferred gait speed before and after AMPS and sham interventions. Footswitches sensors were used to record the kinematic parameters. Electromyographic (EMG) signals of tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) were recorded. Timed up and go (TUG) test and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were performed to assess functional performance.
resultsGL activation increased after AMPS intervention before and after heel strike (p = 0.04; p < 0.01) and before and after toe-off (p = 0.013; p = 0.038). Also, after AMPS intervention, TA activation increased after heel strike (p = 0.007); and after sham intervention, TA activation reduced before and after heel strike (p = 0.038; and p = 0.007) and before toe-off (p = 0.013). The time of TUG test was shorter after AMPS intervention (p = 0.015).
conclusionAMPS intervention changed the EMG activation of ankle muscles during walking and functional performance. However, AMPS intervention did not change gait kinematics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.