Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386096›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

The antifungal and antibiofilm activity of Cymbopogon nardus essential oil and citronellal on clinical strains of Candida albicans.

Leonardo Antunes Trindade, Laísa Vilar Cordeiro, Daniele de Figuerêdo Silva, Pedro Thiago Ramalho Figueiredo, Marcela Lins Cavalcanti de Pontes, Edeltrudes de Oliveira Lima, Alessandra de Albuquerque Tavares Carvalho

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonardo Antunes TrindadeGraduate Program in Dentistry, Department of Clinical and Preventive Dentistry, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Travessa Artur de Sá, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, 50670-901, Brazil. lat363@gmail.com.
Laísa Vilar CordeiroGraduate Program in Natural and Synthetic Bioactive Products, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Daniele de Figuerêdo SilvaGraduate Program in Natural and Synthetic Bioactive Products, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Pedro Thiago Ramalho FigueiredoGraduate Program in Natural and Synthetic Bioactive Products, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Marcela Lins Cavalcanti de PontesGraduate Program in Natural and Synthetic Bioactive Products, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Edeltrudes de Oliveira LimaGraduate Program in Natural and Synthetic Bioactive Products, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Alessandra de Albuquerque Tavares CarvalhoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Department of Clinical and Preventive Dentistry, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Travessa Artur de Sá, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, 50670-901, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigated the antifungal and antibiofilm activity of Cymbopogon nardus essential oil (EO) and its major compound, citronellal, in association with miconazole and chlorhexidine on clinical strains of Candida albicans. The likely mechanism(s) of action of C. nardus EO and citronellal was further determined. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe EO was chemically characterized by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The antifungal activity (MIC/MFC) and antibiofilm effects of C. nardus EO and citronellal were determined by the microdilution method, and their likely mechanism(s) of action was determined by the sorbitol and ergosterol assays. Then, the samples were tested for a potential association with standard drugs through the checkerboard technique. Miconazole and chlorhexidine were used as positive controls and the assays were performed in triplicate.

resultsThe GC-MS analysis tentatively identified citronellal as the major compound in C. nardus EO. Both samples showed antifungal activity, with MIC of 256 µg/mL, as compared to 128 µg/mL and 8 µg/mL of miconazole and chlorhexidine, respectively. C. nardus EO and citronellal effectively inhibited biofilm formation (p < 0.05) and disrupted preformed biofilms (p < 0.0001). They most likely interact with the cell membrane, but not the cell wall, and did not present any synergistic activity when associated with standard drugs.

conclusionC. nardus EO and citronellal showed strong in vitro antifungal and antibiofilm activity on C. albicans. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Natural products have been historically bioprospected for novel solutions to control fungal biofilms. Our data provide relevant insights into the potential of C. nardus EO and citronellal for further clinical testing. However, additional bioavailability and toxicity studies must be carried out before these products can be used for the chemical control of oral biofilms.

Indexed as

CymbopogonOils, VolatileAcyclic MonoterpenesAldehydesAntifungal AgentsBiofilmsCandida albicansChlorhexidineMiconazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAcyclic MonoterpenesAldehydesAntifungal AgentsChlorhexidinecitronellalMiconazoleOils, VolatileAntibiofilmAntifungalCandidaCitronellalCymbopogon

Identifiers

PMID35386096
PMCPMC9433487
OpenAlexW4226041960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.