Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386002›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022

First and repeat rebiopsy for detecting EGFR T790M mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer: CS-Lung-003 prospective observational registry study.

Kenichiro Kudo, Kazuya Nishii, Go Makimoto, Nobuhisa Ishikawa, Yukari Tsubata, Masahiro Kodani, Nobukazu Fujimoto, Masahiro Yamasaki, Tetsuya Kubota, Nagio Takigawa and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. J-REGISTER: real-world study of Japanese patients withFuture oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Kenichiro Kudo *Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Kazuya Nishii *Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Japan.
Go MakimotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Japan.
Nobuhisa IshikawaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yukari TsubataDivision of Medical Oncology and Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Masahiro KodaniDivision of Medical Oncology and Molecular Respirology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Nobukazu FujimotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Masahiro YamasakiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tetsuya KubotaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan.
Nagio TakigawaDepartment of General Internal Medicine 4, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Kazunori FujitakaDepartment of Molecular and Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Nobuhiro KanajiDivision of Hematology, Rheumatology and Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kida, Kagawa, Japan.
Takuo ShibayamaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Junko ItanoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Chihiro AndoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Katsuyuki HottaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan. khotta@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-0843
Katsuyuki KiuraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Okayama University Hospital · JPHiroshima Prefectural Hospital · JPHiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital · JPHiroshima University · JPIwakuni Medical Center · JPKagawa University · JPKawasaki Medical School · JPKōchi University · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPOkayama Rosai Hospital · JPShimane University · JPTottori University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOsimertinib is still essential for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) even in a relapsed setting, which suggests the importance of rebiopsy. The clinical value of repeat rebiopsy in patients with NSCLC who are T790M-negative on a first rebiopsy remains unclear. In this study, we examined the status of the first rebiopsy and evaluated the frequency of repeat rebiopsy of T790M-negative tumors detected by the first rebiopsy.

methodsWe reviewed 144 patients with NSCLC with major EGFR mutations, but not T790M, who received first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), registered in the prospective, umbrella-type lung cancer patient registry (CS-Lung-003).

resultsOverall, 63 patients (44%) underwent the first rebiopsy. In the first rebiopsy, 51 (81%) and 12 (19%) of 63 underwent histological/cytological rebiopsy and liquid biopsy with the blood sampling, respectively. In the repeat rebiopsy, 23 (85%) and 4 (15%) of 27 underwent histological/cytological rebiopsy and liquid biopsy, respectively. The most frequently rebiopsied site was a pulmonary lesion (n = 24, 38.7%). Overall, 29 (46.0%) of 63 patients harbored the T790M mutation. Interestingly, a high detection rate of cancer cells did not necessarily indicate a high detection rate of the T790M mutation (p < 0.01). Among 34 patients with T790M-negative tumors confirmed on the first rebiopsy, 20 (58.8%) underwent repeat rebiopsies following interval therapy, revealing that seven (36.8%) had T790M-positive tumors. Osimertinib yielded median progression-free survival of 11.8 and 16.2 months in patients with the 790M mutation detected by the first rebiopsy and repeat rebiopsy, respectively.

conclusionIn our prospective cohort, the T790M mutation was detected in 46% of patients who underwent the first rebiopsy. Repeat rebiopsy may increase the ability to detect the T790M mutation positivity rate.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAniline CompoundsBiopsyDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsHumansLungMutationObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesProtein Kinase InhibitorsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesAniline CompoundsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsEGFRFirst rebiopsyLung cancerOsimertinibRepeat rebiopsyT790M

Identifiers

PMID35386002
PMCPMC11801113
OpenAlexW4224250432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.