Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35385887›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

Prenatal smoking, alcohol and caffeine exposure and offspring externalizing disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elis Haan, Kirsten E Westmoreland, Laura Schellhas, Hannah M Sallis, Gemma Taylor, Luisa Zuccolo, Marcus R Munafò

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elis HaanSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8872-1248
Kirsten E WestmorelandSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Laura SchellhasSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6436-4821
Hannah M SallisSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gemma TaylorAddiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2185-0162
Luisa ZuccoloMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Marcus R MunafòSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-993X
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0902144Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSeveral studies have indicated an association between maternal prenatal substance use and offspring externalizing disorders; however, it is uncertain whether this relationship is causal. We conducted a systematic review to determine: (1) if the literature supports a causal role of maternal prenatal substance use on offspring externalizing disorders diagnosis and (2) whether these associations differ across externalizing disorders.

methodsWe searched Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO and Medline databases. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and where possible meta-analysis was conducted for studies classed as low risk of bias. We included studies of any design that examined prenatal smoking, alcohol or caffeine use. Studies in non-English language, fetal alcohol syndrome and comorbid autism spectrum disorders were excluded. Participants in the included studies were mothers and their offspring. Measurements included prenatal smoking, alcohol or caffeine use as an exposure, and diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), conduct disorder (CD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in offspring as an outcome.

resultsWe included 63 studies, 46 of which investigated smoking and ADHD. All studies were narratively synthesized, and seven studies on smoking and ADHD were meta-analysed. The largest meta-analysis based on genetically sensitive design included 1 011 546 participants and did not find evidence for an association [odds ratio (OR)

conclusionsThere appears to be no clear evidence to support a causal relationship between maternal prenatal smoking and offspring attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Findings with alcohol and caffeine exposures and conduct disorder and oppositional-defiant disorder need more research, using more genetically sensitive designs.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityConduct DisorderPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsSubstance-Related DisordersCaffeineEthanolFemaleHumansPregnancySmokingCaffeineEthanolADHDalcoholcaffeineconduct disordermeta-analysisODDsmokingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35385887
PMCPMC10308447
OpenAlexW4226478535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.