Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35385886›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2022

The Montreal cognitive assessment as a cognitive screening tool in sickle cell disease: Associations with clinically significant cognitive domains.

Macy L Early, Elizabeth Linton, Allison Bosch, Timothy Campbell, Felicia Hill-Briggs, Lydia H Pecker, Eboni I Lance, Sophie Lanzkron

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neurological management of ischemic stroke in sickle cell disease- a case report with an updated review of the literature.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Macy L EarlyDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2742-1617
Elizabeth LintonCenter on Aging and Health, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Allison BoschDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Timothy CampbellUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Felicia Hill-BriggsFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Zucker School of Medicine, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA.
Lydia H PeckerDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8371-9752
Eboni I LanceNeurology and Developmental Medicine, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7332-8777
Sophie LanzkronDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USBloomberg (United States) · USEmory University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USNorthwell Health · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction, Brain and Neurobehavioral Development in AutismP50HD103538 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Stewart H Mostofsky · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
OVARIAN RESERVE IN POST-MENARCHAL FEMALES WITH SICKLE CELL ANEMIAK23HL146841 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PECKER, LYDIA · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
Clinical and Neuroimaging Phenotypes of Neurodevelopmental Disorders inPediatric Sickle Cell DiseaseK23HL133455 · NHLBI · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI LANCE, EBONI I · 2017 to 2020
$712k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133455NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL146841NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at risk for cognitive impairment, which causes significant morbidity. Guidelines support routine cognitive screening, but no screening test is validated in this population. We explored the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a possible screening test in SCD. We administered the MoCA; a literacy test, the Wide Range Achievement Test, fourth edition (WRAT-4); and a health literacy test, the Shortened Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) to adults with SCD and gathered clinical variables through chart review. Spearman's rho, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests and quantile regression models were used. Among our sample of 49 adults with SCD, the median MoCA score was 25.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 22.0-28.0]. Higher educational attainment was associated with MoCA scores (p = 0.001). In multivariable models, MoCA scores were associated with S-TOFHLA (p = 0.001) and WRAT-4 Reading (p = 0.002) scores, and overt stroke (p = 0.03) at the median. This pilot study adds to the limited literature of cognitive screening tests in adults with SCD and demonstrates a relationship between MoCA scores and measures of literacy and health literacy. The MoCA is a promising option for briefly screening for cognitive impairment in adults with SCD, though further study is needed to confirm its validity.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellCognitive DysfunctionAdultCognitionHumansMental Status and Dementia TestsNeuropsychological TestsPilot Projectscognitive performancecognitive screeninghealth literacyMontreal Cognitive Assessmentsickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID35385886
PMCPMC9541858
OpenAlexW4226363923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.