Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35385670›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2022

Subcortical Cognition: The Fruit Below the Rind.

Karolina Janacsek, Tanya M Evans, Mariann Kiss, Leela Shah, Hal Blumenfeld, Michael T Ullman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Switching Patterns of Cortical-Subcortical Interaction in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karolina JanacsekCentre for Thinking and Learning, Institute for Lifecourse Development, School of Human Sciences, Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom.
Tanya M EvansSchool of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Mariann KissInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Leela ShahSchool of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Hal BlumenfeldDepartments of Neurology, Neuroscience and Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Michael T UllmanBrain and Language Lab, Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; email: michael@georgetown.edu.

Funding

Contributions of Neural Memory CircuitsR01HD049347 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI ULLMAN, MICHAEL T · 2004 to 2010
$2.0M
The neurocognition of procedural and declarative memory in dyslexia and S-RCDR21HD087088 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2016 to 2017
$434k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049347NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD087088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience has highlighted the cerebral cortex while often overlooking subcortical structures. This cortical proclivity is found in basic and translational research on many aspects of cognition, especially higher cognitive domains such as language, reading, music, and math. We suggest that, for both anatomical and evolutionary reasons, multiple subcortical structures play substantial roles across higher and lower cognition. We present a comprehensive review of existing evidence, which indeed reveals extensive subcortical contributions in multiple cognitive domains. We argue that the findings are overall both real and important. Next, we advance a theoretical framework to capture the nature of (sub)cortical contributions to cognition. Finally, we propose how new subcortical cognitive roles can be identified by leveraging anatomical and evolutionary principles, and we describe specific methods that can be used to reveal subcortical cognition. Altogether, this review aims to advance cognitive neuroscience by highlighting subcortical cognition and facilitating its future investigation.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingCerebral CortexCognitionFruitcognitionconnectivityco-optationdynamicnetworksubcortical

Identifiers

PMID35385670
PMCPMC13334545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.