Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35385486›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Development of a virtual classroom for pre-analytical phase of laboratory medicine for undergraduate medical students using the Delphi technique.

Lena Jafri, Muhammad Abbas Abid, Javeria Rehman, Sibtain Ahmed, Ghazanfar Abbas, Howrah Ali, Fatima Kanani, Usman Ali, Nusrat Alavi, Farheen Aslam and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Lena JafriDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-6807-5429
Muhammad Abbas AbidDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-2440-4117
Javeria RehmanDepartment of Education Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sibtain AhmedDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ghazanfar AbbasShifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3539-5017
Howrah AliLiaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fatima KananiThe Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Usman AliZiauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nusrat AlaviRahbar Medical & Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Farheen AslamQuaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Sahar IqbalDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aamir IjazMohi-ud-Din Islamic Medical College, Mirpur, AJK, Pakistan.
Muhammad Usman MunirArmed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Shabnam DildarNational Institute of Blood Disease & Bone Marrow Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syed Haider NawazSindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan.
Khushbakht AdnanBolan Medical College, Quetta, Pakistan.
Aysha Habib KhanDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Adnan Mustafa ZubairiThe Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Imran SiddiquiDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aga Khan University · PKIndus Hospital · PKArmed Forces Institute of Pathology · PKBahawal Victoria Hospital · PKBolan University of Medical and Health Sciences · PKCMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry · PKDow University of Health Sciences · PKLiaquat National Hospital · PKMohi-ud-Din Islamic University · PKNational Institute Of Blood Disease and Bone Marrow Transplantation · PKShifa International Hospital · PKSindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation · PKZiauddin University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmongst the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phase of laboratory testing, pre-analytical phase is the most error-prone. Knowledge gaps in understanding of pre-analytical factors are identified in the clinical years amongst undergraduate students due to lack of formal teaching modules on the pre-analytical phase. This study was conducted to seek experts' consensus in Clinical Chemistry on learning objectives and contents using the Delphi technique with an aim to develop an asynchronous virtual classroom for teaching pre-analytical factors of laboratory testing.

methodsA mixed method study was conducted at the Aga Khan University. A questionnaire comprising of 16 learning objectives and their associated triggers was developed on Google Docs for developing the case vignettes. A four-point Likert Scale, which included strongly agree, agree, disagree and strongly disagree, was utilized for the learning objectives. An open-ended question was included for experts to suggest new items for inclusion. A cut off of at least 75% agreement was set to establish consensus on each item. A total of 17 Chemical Pathology faculty from 13 institutions across Pakistan were invited to participate in the first round of Delphi. Similar method of response was used in round two to establish consensus on the newly identified items suggested by the faculty in round 1. Later, the agreed-upon objectives and triggers were used to develop interactive scenarios over Moodle to concurrently test and teach medical students in a nonchalant manner.

resultsA total of 17 responses were received in Round 1 of the Delphi process (response rate = 100%), while 12 responses were received in Round 2 (response rate = 71%). In round 1, all 16 learning objectives reached the required consensus (≥ 75%) with no additional learning objectives suggested by the experts. Out of 75 triggers in round 1, 61 (81.3%) reached the consensus to be included while 39 were additionally suggested. In 2nd round, 17 out of 39 newly suggested triggers met the desired consensus. 14 triggers did not reach the consensus after two rounds, and were therefore eliminated. The virtual classroom developed using the agreed-upon learning objectives and triggers consisted of 20 items with a total score of 31 marks. The questions included multiple choice questions, fill in the blanks, drag and drop sequences and read-and-answer comprehensions. Specific learning points were included after each item and graphs and pictures were included for a vibrant experience.

conclusionWe developed an effective and interactive virtual session with expert consensus on the pre-analytical phase of laboratory testing for undergraduate medical students which can be used for medical technologist, graduate students and fellows in Chemical Pathology.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalConsensusCurriculumDelphi TechniqueHumansPre-Analytical Phase

Identifiers

PMID35385486
PMCPMC8985926
OpenAlexW4225619892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.