Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35385395›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2022

Factors Predicting Engagement of Older Adults With a Coach-Supported eHealth Intervention Promoting Lifestyle Change and Associations Between Engagement and Changes in Cardiovascular and Dementia Risk: Secondary Analysis of an 18-Month Multinational Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nicola Coley, Laurine Andre, Marieke P Hoevenaar-Blom, Tiia Ngandu, Cathrien Beishuizen, Mariagnese Barbera, Lennard van Wanrooij, Miia Kivipelto, Hilkka Soininen, Willem van Gool and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Nicola ColeyCenter for Epidemiology and Research in Population health (CERPOP), University of Toulouse III Paul Sabatier (UPS), National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) mixed research unit (UMR) 1295, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-824X
Laurine AndreCenter for Epidemiology and Research in Population health (CERPOP), University of Toulouse III Paul Sabatier (UPS), National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) mixed research unit (UMR) 1295, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-8014
Marieke P Hoevenaar-BlomDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6760-5149
Tiia NganduPopulation Health Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3698-2021
Cathrien BeishuizenDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0199-0723
Mariagnese BarberaInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8983-1294
Lennard van WanrooijDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1349-8261
Miia KivipeltoDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0992-3875
Hilkka SoininenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2785-9937
Willem van GoolDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3174-8233
Carol BrayneCambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5307-663X
Eric Moll van CharanteDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1489-5218
Edo RichardDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7250-3390
Sandrine AndrieuCenter for Epidemiology and Research in Population health (CERPOP), University of Toulouse III Paul Sabatier (UPS), National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) mixed research unit (UMR) 1295, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1142-770X
HATICE study groupSee Acknowledgments, .
PRODEMOS study groupSee Acknowledgments, .
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health interventions could help to prevent age-related diseases, but little is known about how older adults engage with such interventions, especially in the long term, or whether engagement is associated with changes in clinical, behavioral, or biological outcomes in this population. Disparities in engagement levels with digital health interventions may exist among older people and be associated with health inequalities.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe older adults' engagement with an eHealth intervention, identify factors associated with engagement, and examine associations between engagement and changes in cardiovascular and dementia risk factors (blood pressure, cholesterol, BMI, physical activity, diet, and cardiovascular and dementia risk scores).

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of the 18-month randomized controlled Healthy Ageing Through Internet Counselling in the Elderly trial of a tailored internet-based intervention encouraging behavior changes, with remote support from a lifestyle coach, to reduce cardiovascular and cognitive decline risk in 2724 individuals aged ≥65 years, recruited offline in the Netherlands, Finland, and France. Engagement was assessed via log-in frequency, number of lifestyle goals set, measurements entered and messages sent to coaches, and percentage of education materials read. Clinical and biological data were collected during in-person visits at baseline and 18 months. Lifestyle data were self-reported on a web-based platform.

resultsOf the 1389 intervention group participants, 1194 (85.96%) sent at least one message. They logged in a median of 29 times, and set a median of 1 goal. Higher engagement was associated with significantly greater improvement in biological and behavioral risk factors, with evidence of a dose-response effect. Compared with the control group, the adjusted mean difference (95% CI) in 18-month change in the primary outcome, a composite z-score comprising blood pressure, BMI, and cholesterol, was -0.08 (-0.12 to -0.03), -0.04 (-0.08 to 0.00), and 0.00 (-0.08 to 0.08) in the high, moderate, and low engagement groups, respectively. Low engagers showed no improvement in any outcome measures compared with the control group. Participants not using a computer regularly before the study engaged much less with the intervention than those using a computer up to 7 (adjusted odds ratio 5.39, 95% CI 2.66-10.95) or ≥7 hours per week (adjusted odds ratio 6.58, 95% CI 3.21-13.49). Those already working on or with short-term plans for lifestyle improvement at baseline, and with better cognition, engaged more.

conclusionsGreater engagement with an eHealth lifestyle intervention was associated with greater improvement in risk factors in older adults. However, those with limited computer experience, who tended to have a lower level of education, or who had poorer cognition engaged less. Additional support or forms of intervention delivery for such individuals could help minimize potential health inequalities associated with the use of digital health interventions in older people.

Indexed as

DementiaTelemedicineAgedExerciseHumansLife StyleRisk FactorsagingcardiovasculardisparitieseHealthengagementlifestylepreventionrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35385395
PMCPMC9127655
OpenAlexW4225565766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.