Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35385351›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Mutational background influences

Sara Hernando-Amado, Pablo Laborda, José Ramón Valverde, José Luis Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolution of Resistant Mutants inMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Drug combinations targeting antibiotic resistance.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Adaptive response ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara Hernando-AmadoCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5822-4996
Pablo LabordaCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8281-7900
José Ramón ValverdeCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6655-7114
José Luis MartínezCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8813-7607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collateral sensitivity is an evolutionary trade-off whereby acquisition of the adaptive phenotype of resistance to an antibiotic leads to the nonadaptive increased susceptibility to another. The feasibility of harnessing such a trade-off to design evolutionary-based approaches for treating bacterial infections has been studied using model strains. However, clinical application of collateral sensitivity requires its conservation among strains presenting different mutational backgrounds. Particularly relevant is studying collateral sensitivity robustness of already-antibiotic-resistant mutants when challenged with a new antimicrobial, a common situation in clinics that has hardly been addressed. We submitted a set of diverse Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic-resistant mutants to short-term evolution in the presence of different antimicrobials. Ciprofloxacin selects different clinically relevant resistance mutations in the preexisting resistant mutants, which gave rise to the same, robust, collateral sensitivity to aztreonam and tobramycin. We then experimentally determined that alternation of ciprofloxacin with aztreonam is more efficient than ciprofloxacin–tobramycin alternation in driving the extinction of the analyzed antibiotic-resistant mutants. Also, we show that the combinations ciprofloxacin–aztreonam or ciprofloxacin–tobramycin are the most effective strategies for eliminating the tested P. aeruginosa antibiotic-resistant mutants. These findings support that the identification of conserved collateral sensitivity patterns may guide the design of evolution-based strategies to treat bacterial infections, including those due to antibiotic-resistant mutants. Besides, this is an example of phenotypic convergence in the absence of parallel evolution that, beyond the antibiotic-resistance field, could facilitate the understanding of evolution processes, where the selective forces giving rise to new, not clearly adaptive phenotypes remain unclear.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinDrug Collateral SensitivityDrug Resistance, BacterialPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinantibiotic resistancecollateral sensitivityconvergent evolutionphenotypic convergencePseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID35385351
PMCPMC9169633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.