Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35385218›Full record

ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2022

Measuring the prediction of observed actions using an occlusion paradigm: Comparing autistic and non-autistic adults.

Emma Gowen, Ellen Poliakoff, Hayley Shepherd, Waltraud Stadler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Motor imagery in autism: a systematic review.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Measuring the prediction of observed actions using an occlusion paradigm: Comparing autistic and non-autistic adults.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma GowenDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4788-4280
Ellen PoliakoffDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Hayley ShepherdDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Waltraud StadlerTechnical University of Munich, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action prediction involves observing and predicting the actions of others and plays an important role in social cognition and interacting with others. It is thought to use simulation, whereby the observers use their own motor system to predict the observed actions. As individuals diagnosed with autism are characterized by difficulties understanding the actions of others and motor coordination issues, it is possible that action prediction ability is altered in this population. This study compared action prediction ability between 20 autistic and 22 non-autistic adults using an occlusion paradigm. Participants watched different videos of a female actor carrying out everyday actions. During each video, the action was transiently occluded by a gray rectangle for 1000 ms. During occlusions, the video was allowed to continue as normal or was moved forward (i.e., appearing to continue too far ahead) or moved backwards (i.e., appearing to continue too far behind). Participants were asked to indicate after each occlusion whether the action continued with the correct timing or was too far ahead/behind. Autistic individuals were less accurate than non-autistic individuals, particularly when the video was too far behind. A trend analysis suggested that autistic participants were more likely to judge too far behind occlusions as being in time. These preliminary results suggest that prediction ability may be altered in autistic adults, potentially due to slower simulation or a delayed onset of these processes. LAY SUMMARY: When we observe other people performing everyday actions, we use their movements to help us understand and predict what they are doing. In this study, we found that autistic compared to non-autistic adults were slightly less accurate at predicting other people's actions. These findings help to unpick the different ways that social understanding is affected in autism.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderAdultFemaleHumansMovementaction perceptionaction predictionautismocclusion paradigmsimulation

Identifiers

PMID35385218
PMCPMC9543210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.