Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35385103›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists2022

National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2022.

Eric M Tichy, James M Hoffman, Katie J Suda, Matthew H Rim, Mina Tadrous, Sandra Cuellar, John S Clark, Jennifer Ward, Glen T Schumock

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of prescribing by dietitians and therapeutic radiographers in England.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multiple sclerosis patients taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) agonists: a single-institution retrospective cohort study of tolerability and weight loss.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Impact of VA Hematology/Oncology Clinical Pharmacy Practitioners in the Review of Community Prescriptions for Specialty Medications.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric M TichyMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
James M HoffmanSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Katie J SudaCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, and Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Matthew H RimCollege of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mina TadrousOntario Drug Policy Research Network (ODPRN), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada, and Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sandra CuellarCollege of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
John S ClarkMichigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, and University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jennifer WardIQVIA, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA.
Glen T SchumockCollege of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USIQVIA (United States) · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMichigan Medicine · USOntario Drug Policy Research Network · CASt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2022 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors.

methodsHistorical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2022 were reviewed-including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for biosimilars, cancer drugs, generics, COVID-19 pandemic influence, and specialty drugs. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates of growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2022 were based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion.

resultsIn 2021, overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the US grew 7.7% compared to 2020, for a total of $576.9 billion. Utilization (a 4.8% increase), price (a 1.9% increase) and new drugs (a 1.1% increase) drove this increase. Adalimumab was the top drug in terms of overall expenditures in 2021, followed by apixaban and dulaglutide. Drug expenditures were $39.6 billion (a 8.4% increase) and $105.0 billion (a 7.7% increase) in nonfederal hospitals and in clinics, respectively. In clinics and hospitals, new products and increased utilization growth drove growth, with decreasing prices for both sectors acting as an expense restraint. Several new drugs that are likely to influence spending are expected to be approved in 2022. Specialty and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures along with the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic.

conclusionFor 2022, we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 4.0% to 6.0%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate increases of 7.0% to 9.0% and 3.0% to 5.0%, respectively, compared to 2021. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any particular health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentPrescription DrugsDrug CostsHealth ExpendituresHumansPandemicsUnited StatesAntineoplastic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsPrescription Drugsbiosimilarscancer drugsCOVID-19drug expenditurespandemicpublic policy

Identifiers

PMID35385103
PMCPMC9383648
OpenAlexW4226081173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.