Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384918›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2022

Machine Learning to Predict Successful Opioid Dose Reduction or Stabilization After Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Syed M Adil, Lefko T Charalambous, Shashank Rajkumar, Andreas Seas, Pranav I Warman, Kelly R Murphy, Shervin Rahimpour, Beth Parente, Rajeev Dharmapurikar, Timothy W Dunn and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Machine Learning in Pain Neuromodulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Machine Learning in Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Syed M AdilDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2322-5478
Lefko T CharalambousDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Shashank RajkumarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Andreas SeasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Pranav I WarmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kelly R MurphyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Shervin RahimpourDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Beth ParenteDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rajeev DharmapurikarHiggs Boson Health, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Timothy W DunnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Shivanand P LadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007171 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KONTOS, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2021
$31.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) effectively reduces opioid usage in some patients, but preoperatively, there is no objective measure to predict who will most benefit.

objectiveTo predict successful reduction or stabilization of opioid usage after SCS using machine learning models we developed and to assess if deep learning provides a significant benefit over logistic regression (LR).

methodsWe used the IBM MarketScan national databases to identify patients undergoing SCS from 2010 to 2015. Our models predict surgical success as defined by opioid dose stability or reduction 1 year after SCS. We incorporated 30 predictors, primarily regarding medication patterns and comorbidities. Two machine learning algorithms were applied: LR with recursive feature elimination and deep neural networks (DNNs). To compare model performances, we used nested 5-fold cross-validation to calculate area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

resultsThe final cohort included 7022 patients, of whom 66.9% had successful surgery. Our 5-variable LR performed comparably with the full 30-variable version (AUROC difference <0.01). The DNN and 5-variable LR models demonstrated similar AUROCs of 0.740 (95% CI, 0.727-0.753) and 0.737 (95% CI, 0.728-0.746) ( P = .25), respectively. The simplified model can be accessed at SurgicalML.com .

conclusionWe present the first machine learning-based models for predicting reduction or stabilization of opioid usage after SCS. The DNN and 5-variable LR models demonstrated comparable performances, with the latter revealing significant associations with patients' pre-SCS pharmacologic patterns. This simplified, interpretable LR model may augment patient and surgeon decision making regarding SCS.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord StimulationAnalgesics, OpioidDrug TaperingHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID35384918
PMCPMC12245366
OpenAlexW4225591883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.