Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384721›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2022

Shuichi Yanagi, Tetsushi Iida, Takehiko Kobayashi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuichi YanagiLaboratory of Genome Regeneration, Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (IQB), The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsushi IidaLaboratory of Genome Regeneration, Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (IQB), The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takehiko KobayashiLaboratory of Genome Regeneration, Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (IQB), The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7990-3741
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome instability causes cellular senescence in many organisms. The rRNA gene cluster (rDNA) is one of the most unstable regions in the genome and this instability might convey a signal that induces senescence in the budding yeast. The instability of rDNA mostly depends on replication fork blocking (RFB) activity which induces recombination and gene amplification. By overexpression of Fob1, responsible for the RFB activity, we found that unstable rDNA induces cell cycle arrest and restricts replicative life span. We isolated yeast mutants that grew normally while Fob1 was overexpressed, expecting that some of the mutated genes would be related to the production of a "senescence signal" that elongates cell cycle, stops cell division and finally restricts replicative life span. Our screen identified three suppressor genes,

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA ReplicationDNA, RibosomalGenes, rRNARibosomal ProteinsRNA, RibosomalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeUbiquitin-Conjugating EnzymesDNA, RibosomalRibosomal ProteinsRNA, RibosomalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUbc4 protein, S cerevisiaeUbiquitin-Conjugating Enzymesbudding yeastgenome instabilitylife spannoncoding transcriptionribosomal RNA gene (rDNA)senescence

Identifiers

PMID35384721
PMCPMC9119118
OpenAlexW4226128767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.