Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384605›Full record

ReviewBehavior research methods2023

Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.

Kenneth Holmqvist, Saga Lee Örbom, Ignace T C Hooge, Diederick C Niehorster, Robert G Alexander, Richard Andersson, Jeroen S Benjamins, Pieter Blignaut, Anne-Marie Brouwer, Lewis L Chuang and 36 more

RetractedAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Protracted development of gaze behaviour.Nature human behaviour · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Foveolar Drusen Decrease Fixation Stability in Pre-Symptomatic AMD.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

46 authors.

Kenneth HolmqvistDepartment of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1738-3207
Saga Lee ÖrbomDepartment of Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany.
Ignace T C HoogeExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diederick C NiehorsterLund University Humanities Lab and Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Robert G AlexanderDepartment of Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Richard AnderssonTobii Pro AB, Danderyd, Sweden.
Jeroen S BenjaminsExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pieter BlignautDepartment of Computer Science and Informatics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Anne-Marie BrouwerTNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
Lewis L ChuangDepartment of Ergonomics, Leibniz Institute for Working Environments and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Kirsten A DalrympleInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Denis DriegheSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Matt J DunnSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Ulrich EttingerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Susann FiedlerVienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.
Tom FoulshamDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Essex, UK.
Jos N van der GeestDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dan Witzner HansenMachine Learning Group, Department of Computer Science, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Samuel B HuttonSR Research Ltd, Ottawa, Canada.
Enkelejda KasneciHuman-Computer Interaction, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Alan KingstoneUniversity of British Columbia, Columbia, Canada.
Paul C KnoxDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ellen M KokDepartment of Education and Pedagogy, Division Education, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Helena LeeUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Joy Yeonjoo LeeSchool of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jukka M LeppänenDepartment of Psychology and Speed-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Stephen MacknikDepartment of Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Päivi MajarantaTAUCHI Research Center, Computing Sciences, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Susana Martinez-CondeDepartment of Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Antje NuthmannInstitute of Psychology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Marcus NyströmLund University Humanities Lab, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jacob L OrquinDepartment of Management, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jorge Otero-MillanHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Soon Young ParkComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stanislav PopelkaDepartment of Geoinformatics, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Frank ProudlockThe University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Frank RenkewitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Austin RoordaHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Michael Schulte-MecklenbeckUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Bonita SharifSchool of Computing, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Frederick ShicCenter for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mark ShovmanEyeviation Systems, Herzliya, Israel.
Mervyn G ThomasThe University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Ward VenrooijElectrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Raimondas ZemblysSmart Eye AB, Göteborg, Sweden.
Roy S HesselsExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Advanced Technology to Study Visual Function on a Cellular ScaleR01EY023591 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI DUNCAN, JACQUE LYNNE, ROORDA, AUSTIN · 2014 to 2023
$11.2M
Novel Perceptual and Oculomotor Heuristics for Enhancing Radiologic PerformanceR01CA258021 · NCI · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI MACKNIK, STEPHEN LOUIS, MARTINEZ-CONDE, SUSANA · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Visual cortical mechanisms for the perception of self-generated vs. external motionR01EY031971 · NEI · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI Stephen Louis Macknik, Susana Martinez-Conde · 2020 to 2026
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258021NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023591NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section "An empirically based minimal reporting guideline").

Indexed as

Eye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyEmpirical ResearchHumansData qualityEye movementsEye trackingReplicabilityReporting guidelinesReporting practicesReporting standardsReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID35384605
PMCPMC9535040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.