Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384591›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2022

Ependymoma: Evaluation and Management Updates.

Roberta Rudà, Francesco Bruno, Alessia Pellerino, Riccardo Soffietti

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metastatic Supratentorial Ependymoma: A Case Presentation and Systematic Review of the Literature.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Reirradiation of recurrent brain tumors: a review by the ESTRO CNS Focus Group.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Effect of radiation on patients with grade 2 intramedullary spine ependymoma.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. "Updates on diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers of CNS tumors".Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberta RudàDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Francesco BrunoDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Alessia PellerinoDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3243-0059
Riccardo SoffiettiDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy. riccardo.soffietti@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9204-7038
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo review state of art and relevant advances in the molecular genetics and management of ependymomas of children and adults. RECENT

findingsEpendymomas may occur either in the brain or in the spinal cord. Compared with intracranial ependymomas, spinal ependymomas are less frequent and exhibit a better prognosis. The new WHO classification of CNS tumors of 2021 has subdivided ependymomas into different histomolecular subgroups with different outcome. The majority of studies have shown a major impact of extent of resection; thus, a complete resection must be performed, whenever possible, at first surgery or at reoperation. Conformal radiotherapy is recommended for grade 3 or incompletely resected grade II tumors. Proton therapy is increasingly employed especially in children to reduce the risk of neurocognitive and endocrine sequelae. Craniospinal irradiation is reserved for metastatic disease. Chemotherapy is not useful as primary treatment and is commonly employed as salvage treatment for patients failing surgery and radiotherapy. Standard treatments are still the mainstay of treatment: the discovery of new druggable pathways will hopefully increase the therapeutic armamentarium in the near future.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEpendymomaAdultChildHumansPrognosisSalvage TherapyChemotherapyConformal radiotherapyMYCN-amplified spinal ependymomaMyxopapillary ependymomaPosterior fossa APosterior fossa BPosterior fossa ependymomasProton therapySpinal cord ependymomasStereotactic radiotherapySupratentorial ependymomasSurgeryYAP-1 fusion-positive ependymomaZFTA fusion-positive ependymoma

Identifiers

PMID35384591
PMCPMC9249684
OpenAlexW4226337021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.