Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384547›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022

Single Cell Approaches to Understand the Earliest Steps in Heart Development.

Fabienne Lescroart, Stéphane Zaffran

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Coordination of cardiogenesis in vivo and in vitro.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Cardiac regeneration: Options for repairing the injured heart.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabienne LescroartAix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, 13005, Marseille, France. fabienne.lescroart@univ-amu.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-4942-7921
Stéphane ZaffranAix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, 13005, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0811-418X
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCardiac progenitors are the building blocks of the heart. Our knowledge, on how these progenitors build the heart, has considerably increased over the last two decades with the development of single cell approaches. We discuss the lessons learnt from clonal analyses and from single cell sequencing technologies on the understanding of the earliest steps of cardiac specification and lineage segregation. RECENT

findingsWhile experiments were initially performed at the population level, the development of approaches to investigate heart development at the single cell resolution has clearly demonstrated that cardiac progenitors are highly heterogeneous, with different progenitors contributing to different cardiac regions and different cardiac cell types. Some critical transcriptional determinants have also been identified for cardiac progenitor specification. Single cell approaches have finally provided insights into the spatio-temporal specification of unipotent and multipotent cardiac progenitors and provided a framework for investigating congenital heart defects.

Indexed as

HeartHeart Defects, CongenitalCell DifferentiationHumansCardiac lineagesCardiac progenitorsCardiac specificationClonal analysisHeart developmentSecond heart fieldSingle-cell transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID35384547
OpenAlexW4223584943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.