Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384543›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2022

Endoscopic treatment of sagittal suture synostosis - a critical analysis of current management strategies.

Verena Fassl, Laura Ellermann, Gabriele Reichelt, Phillipe Pape, Christoph Blecher, Christian Hoffmann, Florian Ringel, Bilal Al-Nawas, Julia Heider, Malte Ottenhausen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Piezosurgery in endoscopic-assisted trigonocephaly correction: a technical note.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Verena FasslDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Laura EllermannDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Gabriele ReicheltDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Phillipe PapeDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph BlecherCranioform, Berlin, Germany.
Christian HoffmannDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Florian RingelDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Bilal Al-NawasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Julia Heider *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Malte Ottenhausen *Department of Neurological Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. Malte.Ottenhausen@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0797-1101
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many centers nowadays offer minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of single suture synostosis, surgical techniques and patient management vary significantly. We provide an overview of how scaphocephaly treated with endoscopic techniques is managed in the reported series and analyze the crucial steps that need to be dealt with during the management process. We performed a review of the published literature including all articles that examined sagittal-suture synostosis treated with endoscopic techniques as part of single- or multicenter studies. Fourteen studies reporting results of 885 patients were included. We identified 5 key steps in the management of patients. A total of 188 patients were female and 537 male (sex was only specified in 10 articles, for 725 included patients, respectively). Median age at surgery was between 2.6 and 3.9 months with a total range from 1.5 to 7.0 months. Preoperative diagnostics included clinical and ophthalmologic examinations as well as neuropsychological and genetic consultations if needed. In 5 publications, a CT scan was routinely performed. Several groups used anthropometric measurements, mostly the cephalic index. All groups analyzed equally recommended to perform endoscopically assisted craniosynostosis surgery with postoperative helmet therapy in children < 3 months of age, at least for non-syndromic cases. There exist significant variations in surgical techniques and patient management for children treated endoscopically for single suture sagittal synostosis. This heterogeneity constitutes a major problem in terms of comparability between different strategies.

Indexed as

Cranial SuturesCraniosynostosesChildCraniotomyEndoscopyFemaleHumansInfantMalePostoperative PeriodSuturesTreatment OutcomeCraniosynostosisEndoscopicEndoscopically assistedSagittal sutureScaphocephalusSuturectomy

Identifiers

PMID35384543
PMCPMC9349114
OpenAlexW4225875623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.