Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384496›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic indicator of colorectal cancer recurrence-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yikuan Chen, Shaobo Mo, Mengdi Wu, Yaqi Li, Xi Chen, Junjie Peng

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Liquid biopsy in modern medicine: advancing diagnostics from molecular insights to clinical practice.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Immune checkpoints in lung cancer.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yikuan Chen *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Shaobo Mo *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Mengdi WuMedical Scientific Affairs, Roche Diagnostics (Shanghai) Limited, Shanghai, 200335, China.
Yaqi LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xi ChenMedical Scientific Affairs, Roche Diagnostics (Shanghai) Limited, Shanghai, 200335, China.
Junjie PengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200032, China. pengjj67@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0371-4960
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNRoche (China) · CN

Funding

ChenGuang Program 20CG08National Natural Science Foundation of China 82002946National Natural Science Foundation of China U1932145Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 18401933402Shanghai Sailing Program 19YF1409500Shanghai Sailing Program 22YF1408800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeColorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. After resection, patients need extensive follow-up to detect asymptomatic recurrences as early as possible to obtain optimal treatment. This study evaluated the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for CRC recurrence.

methodsTwo investigators independently conducted a systematic literature search of peer-reviewed studies that investigated the prognostic value of ctDNA in CRC. Fixed effects or random effects models were applied for all analyses based on the assessment of heterogeneity.

resultsA total of 189 studies were initially retrieved from all databases; ultimately, eight studies with 879 CRC patients were included in this analysis. The pooled median recurrence-free survival was 11.36 months for ctDNA-positive patients. Meta-analysis of hazard ratio (HR) suggested that postoperative ctDNA-positive patients were more likely to experience cancer recurrence than ctDNA-negative patients (pooled HR: 5.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37-8.45).

conclusionsSuccessive monitoring of ctDNA status and follow-up with postoperative computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are useful tools to detect early recurrence in postoperative ctDNA-positive patients.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProspective StudiesRecurrenceBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal cancerctDNAMeta-analysisPrognostic indicatorRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID35384496
PMCPMC8983807
OpenAlexW4225996316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.