Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384456›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2022

A review on the added value of whole-body MRI in metastatic lobular breast cancer.

Basrull N Bhaludin, Nina Tunariu, Dow-Mu Koh, Christina Messiou, Alicia F Okines, Sophie E McGrath, Alistair E Ring, Marina M Parton, Bhupinder Sharma, Tanja Gagliardi and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Imaging in metastatic breast cancer, CT, PET/CT, MRI, WB-DWI, CCA: review and new perspectives.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Basrull N BhaludinDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK. basrull.bhaludin@rmh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8266-1846
Nina TunariuDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK.
Dow-Mu KohDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK.
Christina MessiouDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK.
Alicia F OkinesBreast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Sophie E McGrathBreast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK.
Alistair E RingBreast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, UK.
Marina M PartonBreast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Bhupinder SharmaDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Tanja GagliardiDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Steven D AllenDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Romney PopeDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Stephen R D JohnstonBreast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Kate DowneyDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, England, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILC) account for approximately 15% of breast cancer diagnoses. They can be difficult to diagnose both clinically and radiologically, due to their infiltrative growth pattern. The pattern of metastasis of ILC is unusual, with spread to the serosal surfaces (pleura and peritoneum), retroperitoneum and gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) tracts and a higher rate of leptomeningeal spread than IDC. Routine staging and response assessment with computed tomography (CT) can be undertaken quickly and measurements can be reproduced easily, but this is challenging with metastatic ILC as bone-only/bone-predominant patterns are frequently seen and assessment of the disease status is limited in these scenarios. Functional imaging such as whole-body MRI (WBMRI) allows the assessment of bone and soft tissue disease by providing functional information related to differences in cellular density between malignant and benign tissues. A number of recent studies have shown that WBMRI can detect additional sites of disease in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), resulting in a change in systemic anti-cancer therapy. Although WBMRI and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) have a comparable performance in the assessment of MBC, WBMRI can be particularly valuable as a proportion of ILC are non-FDG-avid, resulting in the underestimation of the disease extent. In this review, we explore the added value of WBMRI in the evaluation of metastatic ILC and compare it with other imaging modalities such as CT and FDG-PET/CT. We also discuss the spectrum of WBMRI findings of the different metastatic sites of ILC with CT and FDG-PET/CT correlation. KEY POINTS: • ILC has an unusual pattern of spread compared to IDC, with metastases to the peritoneum, retroperitoneum and GI and GU tracts, but the bones and liver are the commonest sites. • WBMRI allows functional assessment of metastatic disease, particularly in bone-only and bone-predominant metastatic cancers such as ILC where evaluation with CT can be challenging and limited. • WBMRI can detect more sites of disease compared with CT, can reveal disease progression earlier and provides the opportunity to change ineffective systemic treatment sooner.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, LobularFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyWhole Body ImagingFluorodeoxyglucose F18Breast neoplasmsCarcinoma lobularDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingWhole body imaging

Identifiers

PMID35384456
OpenAlexW4226175402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.