Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384314›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2022

Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non-small cell lung cancer.

Tadashi Sakaguchi, Yoichi Nishii, Akemi Iketani, Seiya Esumi, Maki Esumi, Kazuki Furuhashi, Yuki Nakamura, Yuta Suzuki, Kentaro Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tadashi SakaguchiMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1103-4276
Yoichi NishiiMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Akemi IketaniMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Pathology Department, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Seiya EsumiMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Maki EsumiMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Kazuki FuruhashiMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Yuki NakamuraMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Yuta SuzukiMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Kentaro ItoMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Kentaro FujiwaraMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Koji KatsutaMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Pathology Department, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Osamu TaguchiMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Osamu HatajiMatsusaka Municipal Hospital, Respiratory Center, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Soka Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology to analyze multiple genes and to guide targeted therapy. Although the pathological diagnosis and biomarker tests for patients with advanced lung cancer have mostly been obtained with small biopsy samples, especially with bronchoscopic approaches, the performance for NGS with respect to the different sizes of biopsy forceps remains little known.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer, whose FFPE samples were obtained by endobronchial biopsy/transbronchial biopsy and were submitted for the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT). We compared the analytical performance for ODxTT with respect to the size of biopsy forceps.

resultsA total of 103 samples were identified. The success rate of the ODxTT for the group with all samples obtained with small forceps biopsies (70%) was lower than that of the group with some or all samples obtained with standard forceps biopsies (83%), although without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.20). With regard to the reason for unsuccessful analysis, the proportion of the samples which did not pass the nucleic acid concentration threshold in the former group (15%) was higher compared with that of the latter group (4%) (p = 0.08). The proportion of tissue size 4 mm

conclusionThe analysis of ODxTT for specimens biopsied using only small forceps is prone to be unsuccessful due to an insufficient amount of nucleic acid.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsNucleic AcidsBiopsyBronchoscopyHumansRetrospective StudiesSurgical InstrumentsNucleic Acidsendobronchial biopsynext-generation sequencingnon-small cell lung cancerOncomine dx target testtransbronchial biopsy

Identifiers

PMID35384314
PMCPMC9108074
OpenAlexW4224118974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.