Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384278›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2022

Factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in parents of children with cancer.

Micah A Skeens, Kylie Hill, Anna Olsavsky, Kimberly Buff, Jack Stevens, Terrah Foster Akard, Nilay Shah, Cynthia A Gerhardt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Micah A SkeensCenter for Biobehavioral Health, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6786-8128
Kylie HillCenter for Biobehavioral Health, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Anna OlsavskyCenter for Biobehavioral Health, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7037-2510
Kimberly BuffMomcology, Saint Johns, Florida, USA.
Jack StevensCenter for Biobehavioral Health, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Terrah Foster AkardVanderbilt School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3488-5869
Nilay ShahDivision of Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3766-3572
Cynthia A GerhardtCenter for Biobehavioral Health, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4376-3652
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USSaint John's Hospital · BEVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Training Program For Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA229114 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Chyke Abadama Doubeni, Peter G. Shields · 2018 to 2026
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA229114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimLittle research exists on coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy among caregivers of children with cancer. We aimed to (a) describe vaccine hesitancy in parents of children with cancer for both their child and self, and (b) examine the mediating role of parent-reported COVID impact on the association between COVID exposure and vaccine hesitancy. PROCEDURE: We conducted a national survey of parents of children with cancer via Facebook and Momcology, a pediatric cancer community-based organization recruited February-May 2021. Parents completed standardized measures online. A series of mediation models assessed the role of COVID-19 impact (e.g., effects on parenting and well-being) on associations between COVID-19 exposure (e.g., direct/indirect exposure) and vaccine hesitancy. Moderation models examined the role of treatment status, COVID-19 exposure, impact, and vaccine hesitancy.

resultsParents (n = 491; 90% mothers; 93% White) reported moderate vaccine hesitancy (M = 2.08, SD = 0.76). Specifically, 18.5% (n = 90) reported they would not vaccinate their child, and 24.4% (n = 119) would only consider vaccination. Parents expressed higher concerns about vaccine side effects for their children (M = 3.01, SD = 0.95) than for themselves (M = 2.61, SD = 1.03; t[479] = 9.07, p < .01). Mediation analysis revealed a significant indirect effect of impact (95% CI [-0.013, -0.001]) on the association between higher exposure and higher vaccine hesitancy (b = .02, p = .06). There was no moderating effect of treatment status. Income remained a significant covariate (b = -.11, p < .01).

conclusionLower parent-reported COVID exposure, higher COVID impact, concern for side effects, and lower income may be important factors related to vaccine hesitancy among parents of children with cancer. Providers of childhood cancer survivors should address vaccine hesitancy and potential health risks.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsNeoplasmsChildCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansParentsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 Vaccineschildhood cancerCOVID-19vaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35384278
PMCPMC9088330
OpenAlexW4224081015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.