Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384244›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2022

Placenta accreta spectrum - variations in clinical practice and maternal morbidity between the UK and France: a population-based comparative study.

Stephen J McCall, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Loïc Sentilhes, Rema Ramakrishnan, Sally L Collins, Aurélien Seco, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Marian Knight, Gilles Kayem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Looking back to look forward: Has the time arrived for active management of obstetricians in placenta accreta spectrum?International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephen J McCallNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0078-7010
Catherine Deneux-TharauxUniversité de Paris, CRESS U1153, INSERM, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology (EPOPé) Research Team, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-3321
Loïc SentilhesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Rema RamakrishnanNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6784-8319
Sally L CollinsNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0648-7433
Aurélien SecoClinical Research Unit, Paris-Descartes Necker/Cochin, Paris, France.
Jennifer J KurinczukNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9554-6337
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-4575
Gilles KayemUniversité de Paris, CRESS U1153, INSERM, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology (EPOPé) Research Team, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8218-8814

Funding

French Health Ministry under its Clinical Research Hospital Program AOR12156Medical Research Council (UK)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the management and outcomes of women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in France and the UK.

designTwo population-based cohorts.

settingAll obstetrician-led hospitals in the UK and maternity hospitals in eight French regions. POPULATION: A cohort of 219 women with PAS in France and a cohort of 154 women with PAS in the UK.

methodsThe management and outcomes of women with PAS were compared between the UK and France.

main outcome measuresMedian blood loss, severe postpartum haemorrhage (≥3 l), postpartum infection and damage to surrounding organs.

resultsThe management of PAS differed between the two countries: a larger proportion of women with PAS in the UK had a caesarean hysterectomy compared with France (43% vs 26%, p < 0.001), whereas in France a larger proportion of women with PAS received a uterus-preserving approach compared with the UK (36% vs 19%, p < 0.001). The total median blood loss in the UK was 3 l (IQR 1.7-6.5 l), compared with 1 l (IQR 0.5-2.5 l) in France; more women with PAS had a severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in the UK compared with women with PAS in France (58% vs 21%, p < 0.001) [Correction added on 06 May 2022, after first online publication: '24 hour' has been changed to 'total' in the preceding sentence]. There was no difference between the UK and French populations for postpartum infection or organ damage.

conclusionsThe UK and France have very different approaches to managing PAS, with more women in France receiving a uterine-conserving approach and more women in the UK undergoing caesarean hysterectomy. A life-threatening haemorrhage was more common in the UK than in France, which may be the result of differential management and/or the organisation of the healthcare systems. In women with placenta accreta spectrum, severe haemorrhage was more common in the UK than in France. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In women with placenta accreta spectrum, severe haemorrhage was more common in the UK than in France.

Indexed as

Placenta AccretaPostpartum HemorrhageCesarean SectionFemaleHumansHysterectomyPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdomconservative managementhaemorrhagehysterectomymanagementplacenta accreta spectrum

Identifiers

PMID35384244
PMCPMC9544707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.