Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384070›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2022

Habitat-based biodiversity assessment for ecosystem accounting in the Murray-Darling Basin.

Karel Mokany, Chris Ware, Thomas D Harwood, Rebecca K Schmidt, Simon Ferrier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A habitat-based approach to reporting the direct impacts of an organization on biodiversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Habitat-based biodiversity assessment for ecosystem accounting in the Murray-Darling Basin.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karel MokanyCSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-3697
Chris WareCSIRO, Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Australia.
Thomas D HarwoodCSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Rebecca K SchmidtCSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Simon FerrierCSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how biodiversity is changing over space and time is crucial for well-informed decisions that help retain Earth's biological heritage over the long term. Tracking changes in biodiversity through ecosystem accounting provides this important information in a systematic way and readily enables linking to other relevant environmental and economic data to provide an integrated perspective. We derived biodiversity accounts for the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia's largest catchment. We assessed biodiversity change from 2010 to 2015 for all vascular plants, all waterbirds, and 10 focal species. We applied a scalable habitat-based assessment approach that combined expected patterns in the distribution of biodiversity from spatial biodiversity models with a time series of spatially complete data on habitat condition derived from remote sensing. Changes in biodiversity from 2010 to 2015 varied across regions and biodiversity features. For the entire Murray-Darling Basin, the expected persistence of vascular plants increased slightly from 2010 to 2015 (from 86.8% to 87.1%), mean species richness of waterbirds decreased slightly (from 12.5 to 12.3 species), whereas for the focal species the estimated area of habitat increased for 8 species and decreased for 1 species. Regions in the north of the Murray-Darling Basin generally had decreases in biodiversity from 2010 to 2015, whereas in the south biodiversity was stable or increased. Our results demonstrate the benefits of habitat-based biodiversity assessments in providing fully scalable biodiversity accounts across different biodiversity features, consistent with the United Nations System of Environmental Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA) framework.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemBiodiversityAustraliaaves acuáticascontabilidad de los ecosistemasecosystem accountsespecies amenazadasgeneralized dissimilarity modelingmodelo de disparidad generalizadaplantasplantsSEEA EAthreatened specieswaterbirds受威胁物种广义相异性模型植物水鸟澳大利亚环境经济核算体系-生态系统核算(SEEA EA)生态系统核算

Identifiers

PMID35384070
PMCPMC9796243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.