Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384048›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2022

Prediction of survival with intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia.

Koji Sasaki, Farhad Ravandi, Tapan Kadia, Courtney DiNardo, Gautam Borthakur, Nicholas Short, Nitin Jain, Naval Daver, Elias Jabbour, Guillermo Garcia-Manero and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Haematologica · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AML in the Elderly - When less may be more.Current oncology reports · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Therapeutic Advances in Immunotherapies for Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Koji SasakiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-0610
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-377X
Tapan KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-9832
Courtney DiNardoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9003-0390
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7679-6453
Nicholas ShortDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-2738
Nitin JainDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Naval DaverDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7103-373X
Elias JabbourDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4465-6119
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-2482
Joseph KhouryDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2621-3584
Sergej KonoplevDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sanam LoghaviDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8980-3202
Keyur PatelDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Guillermo Montalban-BravoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4533-5176
Lucia MasarovaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Marina KonoplevaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9347-2212
Hagop KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer SPORE-LeukemiaP50CA100632 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHPALL, ELIZABETH J · 2003 to 2023
$43.7M
Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) P30CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA100632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Predicting outcome helps in treatment decision making. We analyzed survival as the treatment endpoint in 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive chemotherapy from 1980 to 2021. We divided the total study group (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 2790) and a validation group (n = 938). The associations between survival and 27 characteristics were investigated. In the training cohort, the multivariate analysis identified 12 consistent adverse prognostic variables independently associated with worse survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, worse performance status, cardiac comorbidity, leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis except fever of unknown origin. We categorized patients into four prognostic groups, favorable (7%), intermediate (43%), poor (39%), and very poor (11%) with estimated 5-year survival rates of 69%, 36%, 13%, and 3% respectively (p < .001). The predictive model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients with molecular mutation profiles, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified NPM1 (favorable), PTPN11, and TP53 (both unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors. The new proposed predictive model for survival with intensive chemotherapy in patients with AML is robust and can be used to advise patients regarding their prognosis, to modify therapy in remission (e.g., proposing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission), and to compare outcome and benefits on future investigational therapies.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteChromosome AberrationsHumansMutationPrognosisRemission InductionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35384048
PMCPMC11915495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.