ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2022
Prediction of survival with intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized multivariable clinical prognostic model for patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving intensive chemotherapy.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Clonal Cytogenetic Evolution in Relapse of Myeloid Hematological Neoplasms After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.Cancers · 2026Article
- AML Disparities Across Racial Ancestry Groups: A Spotlight on the NPM1 Mutations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Development of a Dynamic Counterfactual Risk Stratification Strategy for Newly Diagnosed Patients With AML Treated With Venetoclax and Azacitidine.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Impact of Cytogenetic Response to Therapy on Long-Term Survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Article
- High NUP210 mRNA expression and its role in prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of measurable residual disease clearance kinetics in patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Use of Primary Prophylaxis with G-CSF in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy Does Not Affect Quality of Response.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- AML in the Elderly - When less may be more.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Current status and research directions in acute myeloid leukemia.Blood cancer journal · 2024Review
- A novel bispecific T-cell engager using the ligand-target csGRP78 against acute myeloid leukemia.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Article
- Early mortality after chemotherapy as a quality indicator-the leukemia perspective.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
- Undetectable measurable residual disease is associated with improved outcomes in AML irrespective of treatment intensity.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Optimizing Treatment Options for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients with Comorbidities.Cancers · 2023Review
- Prediction of survival with lower intensity therapy among older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Cancer · 2023Article
- Current Understanding ofCancers · 2023Review
- Therapeutic Advances in Immunotherapies for Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Predicting outcome helps in treatment decision making. We analyzed survival as the treatment endpoint in 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive chemotherapy from 1980 to 2021. We divided the total study group (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 2790) and a validation group (n = 938). The associations between survival and 27 characteristics were investigated. In the training cohort, the multivariate analysis identified 12 consistent adverse prognostic variables independently associated with worse survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, worse performance status, cardiac comorbidity, leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis except fever of unknown origin. We categorized patients into four prognostic groups, favorable (7%), intermediate (43%), poor (39%), and very poor (11%) with estimated 5-year survival rates of 69%, 36%, 13%, and 3% respectively (p < .001). The predictive model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients with molecular mutation profiles, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified NPM1 (favorable), PTPN11, and TP53 (both unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors. The new proposed predictive model for survival with intensive chemotherapy in patients with AML is robust and can be used to advise patients regarding their prognosis, to modify therapy in remission (e.g., proposing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission), and to compare outcome and benefits on future investigational therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.