Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384019›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2022

Large and small cribriform architecture have similar adverse clinical outcome on prostate cancer biopsies.

L Lucia Rijstenberg, Tim Hansum, Charlotte F Kweldam, Intan P Kümmerlin, Sebastiaan Remmers, Monique J Roobol, Geert J L H van Leenders

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current grading of prostate cancer.Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. [Current grading of prostate cancer. German version].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L Lucia RijstenbergDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-1343
Tim HansumDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Charlotte F KweldamDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Intan P KümmerlinDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sebastiaan RemmersDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Geert J L H van LeendersDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2176-9102
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsInvasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) are associated with adverse outcome in prostate cancer patients, with the large cribriform pattern having the worst outcome in radical prostatectomies. Our objective was to determine the impact of the large and small cribriform patterns in prostate cancer biopsies. METHODS AND

resultsPathological revision was carried out on biopsies of 1887 patients from the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. The large cribriform pattern was defined as having at least twice the size of adjacent benign glands. The median follow-up time was 13.4 years. Hazard ratios for metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Any cribriform pattern was found in 280 of 1887 men: 1.1% IDC in grade group (GG) 1, 18.2% in GG2, 57.1% in GG3, 55.4% in GG4 and 59.3% in GG5; the large cribriform pattern was present in 0, 0.5, 9.8, 18.1 and 17.3%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, small and large cribriform patterns were both (P < 0.005) associated with worse MFS [small: hazard ratio (HR) = 3.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.93-4.78; large: HR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.68-5.99] and DSS (small: HR = 4.07, 95% CI = 2.51-6.62; large: HR = 4.13, 95% CI = 2.14-7.98). Patients with the large cribriform pattern did not have worse MFS (P = 0.77) or DSS (P = 0.96) than those with the small cribriform pattern.

conclusionsBoth small and large cribriform patterns are associated with worse MFS and DSS in prostate cancer biopsies. Patients with the large cribriform pattern on biopsy have a similar adverse outcome as those with the small cribriform pattern.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingProstateProstatectomybiopsycribriformintraductal carcinomaprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35384019
PMCPMC9321809
OpenAlexW4224210881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.