Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383944›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2022

A robust autonomous method for blood demand forecasting.

Esa V Turkulainen, Merel L Wemelsfelder, Mart P Janssen, Mikko Arvas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI and Blood Banking: Predicting Transfusion Demand - A Systematic Review of Forecasting Approaches.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. A Method for Predictive Analysis of Platelet Supply.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esa V TurkulainenResearch and Development, Finnish Red Cross Blood Service, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8844-9344
Merel L WemelsfelderTransfusion Technology Assessment Group, Donor Medicine Department, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5421-3392
Mart P JanssenTransfusion Technology Assessment Group, Donor Medicine Department, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1682-7817
Mikko ArvasResearch and Development, Finnish Red Cross Blood Service, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6902-8488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood supply chain management requires estimates about the demand of blood products. The more accurate these estimates are, the less wastage and fewer shortages occur. While the current literature demonstrates tangible benefits from statistical forecasting approaches, it highlights issues that discourage their use in blood supply chain optimization: there is no single approach that works everywhere, and there are no guarantees that any favorable method performance continues into the future. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe design a novel autonomous forecasting system to solve the aforementioned issues. We show how possible changes in blood demand could affect prediction performance using partly synthetic demand data. We use these data then to investigate the performances of different method selection heuristics. Finally, the performances of the heuristics and single method approaches were compared using historical demand data from Finland and the Netherlands. The development code is publicly accessible.

resultsWe find that a shift in the demand signal behavior from stochastic to seasonal would affect the relative performances of the methods. Our autonomous system outperforms all examined individual methods when forecasting the synthetic demand series, exhibiting meaningful robustness. When forecasting with real data, the most accurate methods in Finland and in the Netherlands are the autonomous system and the method average, respectively. DISCUSSION: Optimal use of method selection heuristics, as with our autonomous system, may overcome the need to constantly supervise forecasts in anticipation of changes in demand while being sufficiently accurate in the absence of such changes.

Indexed as

ForecastingFinlandHumansNetherlandsautonomous systemsblood supply chain managementdemand forecastingrobust methodstime series

Identifiers

PMID35383944
PMCPMC9325496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.