Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383859›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2022

Identification of the most common BRCA alterations through analysis of germline mutation databases: Is droplet digital PCR an additional strategy for the assessment of such alterations in breast and ovarian cancer families?

Alessandro Lavoro, Aurora Scalisi, Saverio Candido, Guido Nicola Zanghì, Roberta Rizzo, Giuseppe Gattuso, Giuseppe Caruso, Massimo Libra, Luca Falzone

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the Therapeutic Potential ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Public neoantigens in breast cancer immunotherapy (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. BRCA Mutations and Fertility Preservation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro LavoroDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Aurora ScalisiItalian League Against Cancer, Section of Catania, I‑95122 Catania, Italy.
Saverio CandidoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Guido Nicola ZanghìDepartment of General Surgery and Medical‑Surgical Specialties, Policlinico‑Vittorio Emanuele Hospital, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Roberta RizzoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe GattusoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe CarusoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Massimo LibraDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Luca FalzoneEpidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, National Cancer Institute IRCCS Fondazione 'G. Pascale', I‑80131 Naples, Italy.
University of Catania · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast and ovarian cancer represent two of the most common tumor types in females worldwide. Over the years, several non‑modifiable and modifiable risk factors have been associated with the onset and progression of these tumors, including age, reproductive factors, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors, as well as family history and genetic factors. Of note, BRCA1 and BRCA2 are two tumor suppressor genes with a key role in DNA repair processes, whose mutations may induce genomic instability and increase the risk of cancer development. Specifically, females with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer harboring BRCA1/2 germline mutations have a 60‑70% increased risk of developing breast cancer and a 15‑40% increased risk for ovarian cancer. Different databases have collected the most frequent germline mutations affecting BRCA1/2. Through the analysis of such databases, it is possible to identify frequent hotspot mutations that may be analyzed with next‑generation sequencing (NGS) and novel innovative strategies. In this context, NGS remains the gold standard method for the assessment of BRCA1/2 mutations, while novel techniques, including droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), may improve the sensitivity to identify such mutations in the hereditary forms of breast and ovarian cancer. On these bases, the present study aimed to provide an update of the current knowledge on the frequency of BRCA1/2 mutations and cancer susceptibility, focusing on the diagnostic potential of the most recent methods, such as ddPCR.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHumansMutationPolymerase Chain ReactionBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA1BRCA2breast cancerDNA repairdroplet digital PCRgermline mutationslarge genomic rearrangementsnext‑generation sequencingovarian cancerSanger sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35383859
PMCPMC8997337
OpenAlexW4223491628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.